Luchins A S
United States Military Academy, West Point, NY.
J Hist Behav Sci. 1993 Jan;29(1):29-47. doi: 10.1002/1520-6696(199301)29:1<29::aid-jhbs2300290105>3.0.co;2-5.
Social control doctrines of mental disorders have influenced a generation of psychologists and have shaped attitudes and discussions about how to treat the mentally ill. In light of the failure of deinstitutionalization as a public policy and the contemporary concern with the medical or biological bases of psychiatric disorders, this paper re-examines social control doctrines. Reviewing mid-nineteenth century statistical accounts, the author challenges claims of social control theorists and shows that in recent years some former social control advocates and revisionists have "recanted" and criticized their earlier use of the concept of social control, particularly the characterization of the asylum as a "total institution."
精神障碍的社会控制学说影响了一代心理学家,并塑造了关于如何治疗精神疾病的态度和讨论。鉴于非机构化作为一项公共政策的失败以及当代对精神疾病的医学或生物学基础的关注,本文重新审视社会控制学说。通过回顾19世纪中叶的统计数据,作者对社会控制理论家的主张提出质疑,并表明近年来一些以前的社会控制倡导者和修正主义者已经“反悔”,并批评他们早期对社会控制概念的使用,特别是将精神病院描述为“完全机构”。