Fischer F M, Moreno CR de C, Fernandez R de L, Berwerth A, dos Santos A M, Bruni A de C
Faculdade de Saúde Publica da Universidade de Sao Paulo, Departamento de Saúde Ambiental, Brasil.
Ergonomics. 1993 Jan-Mar;36(1-3):43-9. doi: 10.1080/00140139308967853.
Cross-sectional studies of working and living conditions were conducted in two Brazilian petrochemical plants between 1988-1989. This paper presents analyses of reported activities undertaken during day- and shiftworkers' leisure time. One hundred and sixteen workers (67 continuous shiftworkers) daily logged standard protocols of all leisure activities, for three consecutive weeks. Workers logged 11,957 instances grouped in 27 different activities. The 14 most commonly mentioned leisure activities were analysed. Those most reported were meals with the family (breakfast, lunch, and dinner) and home TV viewing. Using chi 2 statistics, the results showed that the two factors studied--activities and work schedules (day and shift)--were not related. Analysing estimated coefficients of a second order log linear model, only a very few of the 14 activities most mentioned, did not differ in their frequencies between day and shiftworkers of the same plant. The same happened with the 12 activities most-mentioned of both plants: shiftworkers and dayworkers showed significant differences (p < 0.0001) on almost all frequencies of those activities mentioned. Hypotheses are made to explain some of the results. Home placement, and types of shiftwork schedules (weekly or swiftly rotating shifts) can be responsible for some of the activities performed during the workers' leisure time. Further investigation of those activities which are disturbed or cannot be performed due to work schedules is suggested.
1988 - 1989年间,在巴西的两家石化厂开展了关于工作和生活条件的横断面研究。本文呈现了对日班工人和轮班工人休闲时间所进行活动报告的分析。116名工人(67名连续轮班工人)连续三周每天记录所有休闲活动的标准方案。工人们记录了11957例活动,分为27种不同类型。对提及最多的14种休闲活动进行了分析。提及最多的是与家人一起用餐(早餐、午餐和晚餐)以及在家看电视。使用卡方统计,结果显示所研究的两个因素——活动和工作时间表(日班和轮班)——并无关联。分析二阶对数线性模型的估计系数,在同一工厂的日班工人和轮班工人中,所提及的14种活动中只有极少数活动的频率没有差异。两家工厂提及最多的12种活动情况也是如此:轮班工人和日班工人在几乎所有提及活动的频率上都存在显著差异(p < 0.0001)。文中提出了一些假设来解释部分结果。家庭安排以及轮班时间表的类型(每周轮班或快速轮换班次)可能是导致工人休闲时间所进行某些活动的原因。建议对那些因工作时间表而受到干扰或无法进行的活动展开进一步调查。