Carr A, Penny R, Cooper D A
Centre for Immunology, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
AIDS. 1993 Jan;7(1):65-71. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199301000-00010.
This study was undertaken to determine whether patients infected with HIV and with prior hypersensitivity to trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) can be rechallenged successfully with TMP-SMX, what factors predict successful rechallenge, and whether hypersensitivity is due to TMP or to SMX.
A prospective, open study.
A tertiary referral hospital.
Thirty-one HIV-infected patients with a history of non-life-threatening hypersensitivity to TMP-SMX.
Patients received TMP (300 mg twice a week) for 2 weeks and, where no major reaction occurred, subsequently with TMP-SMX (160 and 800 mg per tablet, one tablet two times a day, twice a week). Patients who developed significant and persistent hypersensitivity ceased SMX and were subsequently challenged with TMP-dapsone (300 and 100 mg, respectively, twice a week).
That rechallenge is more likely to be successful in those with advanced HIV disease.
Five out of 31 (16%) patients developed hypersensitivity to TMP, and two ceased TMP as a result. Fifteen of the 26 (58%) patients who received subsequent TMP-SMX developed hypersensitivity, 12 of whom ceased TMP-SMX because of this reaction. Hypersensitivity to TMP-SMX was significantly less common in those with a CD4+ cell count < 20 x 10(6)/l than in those with a CD4+ cell count > 20 x 10(6)/l (31 versus 85%; P = 0.03). Hypersensitivity to TMP-dapsone occurred in two out of nine patients with hypersensitivity to TMP-SMX on rechallenge. One patient developed transient dyspnoea following a dose of SMX, but no other serious adverse drug reaction occurred.
Rechallenge with TMP-SMX appears safe in HIV-infected patients with a history of non-life-threatening hypersensitivity and is most likely to be successful in patients with a low CD4+ lymphocyte count. The data suggest a low rate cross-hypersensitivity between SMX and dapsone, at least at the doses used.
本研究旨在确定感染人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)且既往对复方新诺明(TMP-SMX)过敏的患者是否能成功再次使用TMP-SMX进行激发试验,哪些因素可预测激发试验成功,以及过敏反应是由TMP还是磺胺甲恶唑(SMX)引起。
一项前瞻性、开放性研究。
一家三级转诊医院。
31例有非危及生命的TMP-SMX过敏史的HIV感染患者。
患者先接受TMP(每周两次,每次300毫克)治疗2周,若未出现严重反应,随后接受TMP-SMX(每片含160毫克和800毫克,每天两次,每次一片,每周两次)治疗。出现显著且持续过敏反应的患者停用SMX,随后接受TMP-氨苯砜(分别为每周两次,每次300毫克和100毫克)激发试验。
在HIV疾病晚期患者中再次激发试验更可能成功。
31例患者中有5例(16%)对TMP过敏,其中2例因此停用TMP。接受后续TMP-SMX治疗的26例患者中有15例(58%)出现过敏反应,其中12例因该反应停用TMP-SMX。CD4+细胞计数<20×10⁶/L的患者中对TMP-SMX过敏的情况明显少于CD4+细胞计数>20×10⁶/L的患者(31%对85%;P = 0.03)。再次激发试验时,9例对TMP-SMX过敏的患者中有2例出现对TMP-氨苯砜过敏。1例患者在服用一剂SMX后出现短暂呼吸困难,但未发生其他严重药物不良反应。
对于有非危及生命过敏史的HIV感染患者,再次使用TMP-SMX进行激发试验似乎是安全的,且在CD4+淋巴细胞计数低的患者中最有可能成功。数据表明,至少在所使用的剂量下,SMX和氨苯砜之间的交叉过敏率较低。