McKenzie R, Sharifi-Azad S, Dershwitz M, Miguel R, Joslyn A F, Tantisira B, Rosenblum F, Rosow C E, Downs J B, Bowie J R
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Pittsburgh, PA.
J Clin Anesth. 1993 Jan-Feb;5(1):30-6. doi: 10.1016/0952-8180(93)90084-r.
To compare the efficacy and safety profiles of intravenous (IV) ondansetron (two 8 mg doses 8 hours apart) and a placebo when used in the prevention of postoperative nausea and emesis (vomiting or retching).
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel, multicenter pilot study.
Four university hospitals in the United States.
Two hundred seven women scheduled to undergo inpatient surgical procedures during general anesthesia.
Patients were randomized to receive, in a double-blind fashion, either two 8 mg doses of IV ondansetron or a placebo. The first study drug dose was administered before induction of anesthesia; the second dose was given 8 hours later. Each study drug dose was admixed with normal saline to 20 ml and administered IV over 2 to 5 minutes. Vital signs were monitored immediately before and 1 minute after completion of the study drug infusion.
For the 24-hour period following operation, 60% of the patients who received ondansetron and 26% of the patients who received the placebo were emesis-free (p < 0.001). Subanalyses based on patients' previous history of general anesthesia indicated that ondansetron was superior to the placebo in preventing emesis regardless of history [66% vs. 33% in patients who had never had general anesthesia or had had no nausea or emesis following previous anesthesia (p = 0.001) and 50% vs. 17% in patients who had nausea or emesis following previous anesthesia (p = 0.005)]. Ondansetron also was superior to the placebo for the prevention of nausea over the 24-hour study period regardless of anesthesia history. Ondansetron was generally well tolerated. The adverse event, vital sign, and clinical laboratory test profiles were similar to those for the placebo. No patient who received ondansetron had untoward changes in central nervous system function, including sedation.
Prophylactic IV ondansetron appears to be safe and causes a significant reduction in the frequency and severity of postoperative nausea and emesis.
比较静脉注射昂丹司琼(相隔8小时给予两剂8毫克)和安慰剂预防术后恶心和呕吐(呕吐或干呕)的疗效和安全性。
随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行、多中心试点研究。
美国的四家大学医院。
207名计划在全身麻醉下接受住院手术的女性。
患者以双盲方式随机接受两剂8毫克静脉注射昂丹司琼或安慰剂。第一剂研究药物在麻醉诱导前给药;第二剂在8小时后给予。每剂研究药物与生理盐水混合至20毫升,并在2至5分钟内静脉注射。在研究药物输注完成前即刻和完成后1分钟监测生命体征。
术后24小时内,接受昂丹司琼的患者中有60%无呕吐,接受安慰剂的患者中有26%无呕吐(p<0.001)。根据患者既往全身麻醉史进行的亚组分析表明,无论既往史如何,昂丹司琼在预防呕吐方面均优于安慰剂[既往从未接受过全身麻醉或既往麻醉后无恶心或呕吐的患者中,分别为66%和33%(p=0.001);既往麻醉后有恶心或呕吐的患者中,分别为50%和17%(p=0.005)]。在24小时研究期间,无论麻醉史如何,昂丹司琼在预防恶心方面也优于安慰剂。昂丹司琼总体耐受性良好。不良事件、生命体征和临床实验室检查结果与安慰剂相似。接受昂丹司琼的患者中没有出现包括镇静在内的中枢神经系统功能异常变化。
预防性静脉注射昂丹司琼似乎是安全的,可显著降低术后恶心和呕吐的频率及严重程度。