Goldstein A M, Dracopoli N C, Ho E C, Fraser M C, Kearns K S, Bale S J, McBride O W, Clark W H, Tucker M A
Family Studies Section, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892.
Am J Hum Genet. 1993 Mar;52(3):537-50.
Assignment of a susceptibility locus for cutaneous malignant melanoma-dysplastic nevus (CMM/DN) to chromosome 1p remains controversial. We examined the relationship between CMM/DN and markers D1S47, PND, and D1S160 on seven new families (set B) plus updated versions of six previously reported families (set A). Three linkage analyses were performed: (1) CMM alone--all individuals without confirmed melanoma or borderline lesions were considered unaffected (model I); (2) CMM/DN with variable age at onset and sporadics (model II); and (3) CMM/DN using the model of Bale et al. (model III). For CMM alone and D1S47, Zmax = 3.12 at theta = .10. For D1S160 and CMM alone, Zmax = 1.76 at theta = .10. PND showed no evidence for linkage to CMM alone. Models II and III showed strong evidence for linkage to D1S47, D1S160, and PND in the set A pedigrees but not in the set B families. We tested for homogeneity of CMM/DN (model II) by splitting families into two groups on the basis of (1) the proportion of CMM/DN cases and (2) the occurrence of immune-related tumors. In group 1 there was significant evidence of heterogeneity with both D1S47 and D1S160, and in group 2 there was significant evidence of heterogeneity with D1S160. Thus, diagnostic, clinical, and genetic heterogeneity are the likely reasons that previous studies have failed to confirm linkage of CMM/DN to chromosome 1p. The results showed significant evidence for a CMM locus linked to D1S47, as well as significant evidence for heterogeneity with only a subset of the families appearing linked to chromosome 1p.
将皮肤恶性黑色素瘤-发育异常痣(CMM/DN)的一个易感基因座定位于1号染色体上仍存在争议。我们研究了7个新家族(B组)以及6个先前报道家族的更新版本(A组)中CMM/DN与标记D1S47、PND和D1S160之间的关系。进行了三项连锁分析:(1)仅针对CMM——所有未确诊黑色素瘤或临界病变的个体被视为未患病(模型I);(2)发病年龄可变的CMM/DN和散发病例(模型II);以及(3)使用Bale等人的模型的CMM/DN(模型III)。对于仅CMM和D1S47,在θ = 0.10时,Zmax = 3.12。对于仅CMM和D1S160,在θ = 0.10时,Zmax = 1.76。PND未显示出与仅CMM连锁的证据。模型II和III显示在A组家系中有与D1S47、D1S160和PND连锁的有力证据,但在B组家族中没有。我们根据(1)CMM/DN病例的比例和(2)免疫相关肿瘤的发生情况将家族分为两组,对CMM/DN(模型II)进行了同质性检验。在第1组中,有显著证据表明D1S47和D1S160均存在异质性,在第2组中,有显著证据表明D1S160存在异质性。因此,诊断、临床和遗传异质性可能是先前研究未能证实CMM/DN与1号染色体p臂连锁的原因。结果显示有显著证据表明存在一个与D1S47连锁 的CMM基因座,同时也有显著证据表明存在异质性,只有一部分家族似乎与1号染色体连锁。