Suppr超能文献

基于问题的学习课程中的问题有效性。

Problem effectiveness in a course using problem-based learning.

作者信息

Dolmans D H, Gijselaers W H, Schmidt H G, van der Meer S B

机构信息

Department of Educational Development and Research, University of Limburg, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Acad Med. 1993 Mar;68(3):207-13. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199303000-00013.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Problem-based learning (PBL) emphasizes active generation of learning issues by students. Both students and teachers, however, tend to worry that not all important knowledge will be acquired. To explore this question, problem effectiveness (i.e., for each problem, the degree of correspondence between student-generated learning issues and present faculty objectives) was examined in three interdependent studies.

METHOD

The three studies used the same participants: about 120 second-year students and 12 faculty tutors in a six-week course on normal pregnancy, delivery, and child development at the medical school of the University of Limburg in The Netherlands, 1990-91. The participants were randomly assigned to 12 tutorial groups that were each given the same 12 problems; the problems were based on 51 faculty objectives; the tutors were asked to record all learning issues generated by their groups. Study 1 addressed this question: To what degree are faculty objectives reflected by student-generated learning issues? Study 2: To what extent do students miss certain objectives, and are these objectives classifiable? Study 3: Do students generate learning issues not expected by the faculty, and are these issues relevant to course content, and finally, why do students generate these issues? To help answer these questions, the studies employed expert raters and a teacher familiar with the course content.

RESULTS

Study 1: For the set of 12 problems, the average overlap between learning issues and faculty objectives was 64.2% with the percentages for individual problems ranging from 27.7% to 100%. Study 2: Of the 51 objectives, 30 were not identified by at least one tutorial group; these objectives were grouped into three categories; on average, each group failed to identify 7.4 objectives (15%). Study 3: Of 520 learning issues, 32 (6%) were unexpected; 15 of these were judged to be at least fairly relevant to course content; they were grouped into four categories.

CONCLUSIONS

The students' learning activities covered an average of 64% of the intended course content; in addition, the students generated learning issues not expected by the faculty, and half of these issues were judged relevant to the course content. Thus, PBL seems to permit students to adapt learning activities to their own needs and interests.

摘要

背景

基于问题的学习(PBL)强调学生主动提出学习问题。然而,学生和教师都往往担心无法掌握所有重要知识。为探讨这一问题,在三项相互关联的研究中对问题有效性(即对于每个问题,学生提出的学习问题与当前教师目标之间的相符程度)进行了考察。

方法

这三项研究使用了相同的参与者:1990 - 1991年,荷兰林堡大学医学院为期六周的正常妊娠、分娩和儿童发育课程中的约120名二年级学生和12名教师导师。参与者被随机分配到12个辅导小组,每个小组都被给予相同的12个问题;这些问题基于51个教师目标;要求导师记录其小组提出的所有学习问题。研究1探讨了这个问题:学生提出的学习问题在多大程度上反映了教师目标?研究2:学生在多大程度上遗漏了某些目标,以及这些目标是否可分类?研究3:学生是否提出了教师未预期到的学习问题,这些问题与课程内容是否相关,最后,学生为什么会提出这些问题?为帮助回答这些问题,研究聘请了专家评分员和一位熟悉课程内容的教师。

结果

研究1:对于这组12个问题,学习问题与教师目标之间的平均重叠率为64.2%,单个问题的重叠率从27.7%到100%不等。研究2:在51个目标中,至少有一个辅导小组未识别出30个目标;这些目标被分为三类;平均每个小组未识别出7.4个目标(15%)。研究3:在520个学习问题中,32个(6%)是未预期到的;其中15个被判定至少与课程内容有一定相关性;它们被分为四类。

结论

学生的学习活动平均涵盖了预期课程内容的64%;此外,学生提出了教师未预期到的学习问题,其中一半问题被判定与课程内容相关。因此,基于问题的学习似乎使学生能够根据自身需求和兴趣调整学习活动。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验