Karamanoglu M, O'Rourke M F, Avolio A P, Kelly R P
Centre for Biomedical Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Eur Heart J. 1993 Feb;14(2):160-7. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/14.2.160.
Amplification of the pressure pulse between central and peripheral arteries renders pressure values in the upper limb an inaccurate measure of ascending aortic (AA) pressure. Accuracy could be improved by allowance for such amplification. Transfer functions (TF) for pressures between AA and brachial artery (BA):(BATF) and between AA and radial artery (RA):(RATF) were derived from high-fidelity pressure recordings obtained at cardiac catheterization in 14 patients under control conditions, and after sublingual nitroglycerine 0.3 mg. There was no significant difference in BATF under control conditions and with nitroglycerine; hence results were pooled. Control and nitroglycerine results were also pooled to obtain a single RATF. BATF and RATF moduli peaked at 5 Hz and 4 Hz, reaching 2.5 and 2.8 times the value at zero frequency respectively. Frequency-dependent changes in modulus and phase of BATF and RATF were attributable to wave travel and reflection in the upper limb. BATF and RATF were compared to published transfer functions and those derived from analysis of aortic and brachial or radial pressure waves in previous publications. Results were similar. Our BATF and RATF were used to synthesize AA pressure waves from published peripheral pulses. Correspondence was close, especially for systolic pressure which differed by 2.4 +/- 1.0 (mean +/- SEM) mmHg, whereas recorded systolic pressure differed by 20.4 +/- 2.6 (mean +/- SEM) mmHg between central and peripheral sites. Results indicate that in adult humans a single generalized TF can be used with acceptable accuracy to determine central from peripheral pressure under different conditions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
中心动脉与外周动脉之间压力脉冲的放大使得上肢的压力值无法准确测量升主动脉(AA)压力。考虑到这种放大情况可能会提高测量准确性。从14名患者在对照条件下以及舌下含服0.3毫克硝酸甘油后进行心导管检查时获得的高保真压力记录中,推导出了AA与肱动脉(BA)之间的压力传递函数(TF):(BATF)以及AA与桡动脉(RA)之间的压力传递函数:(RATF)。对照条件下和使用硝酸甘油后的BATF没有显著差异;因此将结果合并。对照和硝酸甘油的结果也合并以获得单个RATF。BATF和RATF的模量在5赫兹和4赫兹时达到峰值,分别达到零频率时值的2.5倍和2.8倍。BATF和RATF模量及相位随频率的变化归因于上肢中的波传播和反射。将BATF和RATF与已发表的传递函数以及先前出版物中从主动脉和肱动脉或桡动脉压力波分析得出的传递函数进行了比较。结果相似。我们的BATF和RATF被用于根据已发表的外周脉搏合成AA压力波。两者吻合度很高,尤其是收缩压,中心和外周部位的收缩压相差2.4±1.0(均值±标准误)毫米汞柱,而记录的收缩压相差20.4±2.6(均值±标准误)毫米汞柱。结果表明,在成年人体内,一个单一的通用TF可用于在不同条件下以可接受的准确性从外周压力确定中心压力。(摘要截短为250字)