• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于地尔硫䓬氯衍生物克仑硫䓬对稳定型心绞痛患者的剂量反应研究。CAMCAT研究组。

A dose-response study of clentiazem, a chloro-derivative of diltiazem, in patients with stable angina. CAMCAT Study Group.

作者信息

Waters D, Garceau D

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993 Mar 15;21(4):964-70. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90354-4.

DOI:10.1016/0735-1097(93)90354-4
PMID:8450166
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The efficacy and safety of clentiazem were assessed in 199 patients with stable angina in a dose-ranging, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel design study.

BACKGROUND

To date, this is the first large efficacy and safety study of clentiazem in patients with stable angina.

METHODS

After washout and a 1-week placebo run-in period, patients received 20, 40, 80 or 120 mg/day of clentiazem tablets or placebo as a twice-daily dosage for 1 week of treatment after 1 week of dose titration. A symptom-limited exercise tolerance test was performed 4 and 12 h after dosing at the end of treatment and results were compared with baseline measurements.

RESULTS

At 4 h after dosing, improvement of exercise duration from baseline value was significantly greater with clentiazem at doses of 40 mg/day (63 +/- 11 s), 80 mg/day (99 +/- 10 s) and 120 mg/day (70 +/- 11 s) than with placebo (34 +/- 10 s). Moreover, clentiazem (80 and 120 mg/day) increased the time to onset of angina and to > or = 1 mm of ST segment depression significantly more than did placebo. At submaximal exercise, clentiazem (40, 80 and 120 mg/day) decreased rate-pressure product, mainly as a result of a decrease in heart rate. At 12 h after dosing, improvement of exercise duration from baseline was significantly greater with clentiazem in doses of 80 mg/day (77 +/- 9 s) and 120 mg/day (70 +/- 10 s) than with placebo (42 +/- 9 s). The incidence of treatment-related adverse events with placebo (27%) and clentiazem (29%) was similar. The most frequently reported treatment-related adverse events with clentiazem were asthenia, headache (both 7.9%), first-degree atrioventricular block and dizziness (both 4.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this short-term study suggest that clentiazem given twice daily in doses of 80 or 120 mg/day is safe and effective monotherapy in the treatment of stable angina.

摘要

目的

在一项剂量范围、安慰剂对照、双盲、平行设计研究中,对199例稳定型心绞痛患者评估了克仑硫卓的疗效和安全性。

背景

迄今为止,这是克仑硫卓在稳定型心绞痛患者中的首个大型疗效和安全性研究。

方法

在洗脱期和1周的安慰剂导入期后,患者在剂量滴定1周后,接受20、40、80或120毫克/天的克仑硫卓片或安慰剂,每日两次给药,治疗1周。在治疗结束时给药后4小时和12小时进行症状限制性运动耐量试验,并将结果与基线测量值进行比较。

结果

给药后4小时,40毫克/天(63±11秒)、80毫克/天(99±10秒)和120毫克/天(70±11秒)剂量的克仑硫卓使运动持续时间较基线值的改善显著大于安慰剂(34±10秒)。此外,克仑硫卓(80和120毫克/天)使心绞痛发作时间和ST段压低≥1毫米的时间显著长于安慰剂。在次极量运动时,克仑硫卓(40、80和120毫克/天)降低了心率血压乘积,主要是由于心率降低。给药后12小时,80毫克/天(77±9秒)和120毫克/天(70±10秒)剂量的克仑硫卓使运动持续时间较基线的改善显著大于安慰剂(42±9秒)。安慰剂(27%)和克仑硫卓(29%)的治疗相关不良事件发生率相似。克仑硫卓最常报告的治疗相关不良事件是乏力、头痛(均为7.9%)、一度房室传导阻滞和头晕(均为4.4%)。

结论

这项短期研究的结果表明,每日两次给予80或120毫克/天剂量的克仑硫卓是治疗稳定型心绞痛的安全有效的单一疗法。

相似文献

1
A dose-response study of clentiazem, a chloro-derivative of diltiazem, in patients with stable angina. CAMCAT Study Group.一项关于地尔硫䓬氯衍生物克仑硫䓬对稳定型心绞痛患者的剂量反应研究。CAMCAT研究组。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993 Mar 15;21(4):964-70. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90354-4.
2
Diltiazem, nifedipine, and their combination in patients with stable angina pectoris: effects on angina, exercise tolerance, and the ambulatory electrocardiographic ST segment.地尔硫䓬、硝苯地平及其联合用药治疗稳定型心绞痛患者:对心绞痛、运动耐量及动态心电图ST段的影响
Circulation. 1988 Apr;77(4):774-86. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.77.4.774.
3
Beneficial effects of high-dose diltiazem in patients with persistent effort angina on beta-blockers and nitrates: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over study.
Circulation. 1985 Jun;71(6):1197-205. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.71.6.1197.
4
A randomized, double-blind comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of once-daily modified-release diltiazem capsules with once-daily amlodipine tablets in patients with stable angina.一项针对稳定性心绞痛患者,每日一次服用缓释地尔硫䓬胶囊与每日一次服用氨氯地平片的疗效及耐受性的随机双盲对照研究。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2001 Sep;38(3):356-64. doi: 10.1097/00005344-200109000-00004.
5
Combination of calcium channel blockers and beta-adrenoceptor blockers for patients with exercise-induced angina pectoris: a double-blind parallel-group comparison of different classes of calcium channel blockers. Netherlands Working Group on Cardiovascular Research (WCN).钙通道阻滞剂与β-肾上腺素能受体阻滞剂联合用于运动诱发性心绞痛患者:不同类别钙通道阻滞剂的双盲平行组比较。荷兰心血管研究工作组(WCN)
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1999 May;47(5):493-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1999.00924.x.
6
Clinical efficacy and safety of once-daily diltiazem in patients with stable angina pectoris switched from twice-daily diltiazem.从每日两次服用地尔硫䓬转换为每日一次服用地尔硫䓬治疗稳定型心绞痛患者的临床疗效及安全性。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1995 Jul;26(1):85-9. doi: 10.1097/00005344-199507000-00014.
7
An 8-week double-blind study of amlodipine and diltiazem in patients with stable exertional angina pectoris.氨氯地平和地尔硫䓬治疗稳定型劳力性心绞痛患者的为期8周的双盲研究。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1991;17 Suppl 1:S53-6. doi: 10.1097/00005344-199117001-00017.
8
Dose-response evaluation of once-daily therapy with a new formulation of diltiazem for stable angina pectoris. Diltiazem CD Study Group.新型缓释地尔硫䓬制剂每日一次治疗稳定型心绞痛的剂量-反应评估。地尔硫䓬缓释片研究组
Am J Cardiol. 1994 Jul 1;74(1):9-17. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(94)90483-9.
9
A comparative study of once-daily amlodipine versus twice-daily diltiazem controlled release (CR) in the treatment of stable angina pectoris. Amlodipine Study Group.氨氯地平每日一次与地尔硫䓬缓释片每日两次治疗稳定型心绞痛的对比研究。氨氯地平研究组。
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1998 Oct;12 Suppl 3:233-7. doi: 10.1023/a:1007726109850.
10
Combination of calcium channel blockers and beta blockers for patients with exercise-induced angina pectoris: a double-blind parallel-group comparison of different classes of calcium channel blockers. The Netherlands Working Group on Cardiovascular Research (WCN).钙通道阻滞剂与β受体阻滞剂联合用于运动诱发性心绞痛患者:不同类别钙通道阻滞剂的双盲平行组比较。荷兰心血管研究工作组(WCN)。
Angiology. 1999 Jun;50(6):447-54. doi: 10.1177/000331979905000602.