Reeder F
Nurs Sci Q. 1993 Spring;6(1):13-24. doi: 10.1177/089431849300600107.
Natural science and human science are identified as the bases of most nursing theories and research programs. Natural science has been disclaimed by Martha Rogers as the philosophy of science that undergirds her work. The question remains, is the science of unitary human beings an interpretive human science? The author explores the works of Rogers through a dialectic with two human scientists' works. Wilhelm Dilthey's works represent the founding or traditional view, and Jurgen Habermas' works represent a contemporary, reconstructionist view. The ways Rogerian thought contributes to human studies but is distinct from traditional and reconstructionist human sciences are illuminated.
自然科学和人文科学被视为大多数护理理论和研究项目的基础。玛莎·罗杰斯否认自然科学是支撑其工作的科学哲学。问题依然存在，即关于整体人的科学是否是一门诠释性的人文科学？作者通过与两位人文科学家的著作进行辩证探讨来研究罗杰斯的作品。威廉·狄尔泰的著作代表了创始或传统观点，尤尔根·哈贝马斯的著作代表了当代的重建主义观点。罗杰斯思想对人文研究的贡献方式以及它与传统和重建主义人文科学的不同之处得以阐明。
