• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

FAMCARE量表的效度和信度测试:衡量家庭对晚期癌症护理的满意度。

Validity and reliability testing of the FAMCARE Scale: measuring family satisfaction with advanced cancer care.

作者信息

Kristjanson L J

机构信息

Faculty of Nursing, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 1993 Mar;36(5):693-701. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(93)90066-d.

DOI:10.1016/0277-9536(93)90066-d
PMID:8456339
Abstract

The purpose of the study was to test the validity and reliability of the FAMCARE Scale which was developed to measure family satisfaction with advanced cancer care. The FAMCARE Scale was developed based upon earlier qualitative research which identified indicators of family care satisfaction and a subsequent Q-sort study that reduced those items to the most salient indicators of satisfaction according to a larger, representative sample (N = 210). A pilot test of the FAMCARE Scale using a convenience sample of 30 family members of advanced cancer patients was conducted. The scale achieved internal consistency estimates of 0.93 at two testing times, a test-retest correlation of 0.91, and estimates of criterion validity using the McCusker Scale of 0.80 and 0.77. Cluster analysis of the scale suggested 4 subdimensions. Although the scale requires further testing to establish its reliability and validity, these preliminary results indicate that the scale may be a psychometrically sound instrument useful for measurement of family satisfaction with advanced cancer care.

摘要

本研究的目的是检验FAMCARE量表的有效性和可靠性,该量表旨在衡量家庭对晚期癌症护理的满意度。FAMCARE量表是基于早期的定性研究开发的,该研究确定了家庭护理满意度的指标,随后进行了Q分类研究,根据一个更大的代表性样本(N = 210)将这些项目缩减为最突出的满意度指标。使用30名晚期癌症患者家庭成员的便利样本对FAMCARE量表进行了预测试。该量表在两次测试时的内部一致性估计值为0.93,重测相关性为0.91,使用麦卡斯基尔量表的效标效度估计值分别为0.80和0.77。该量表的聚类分析表明有4个维度。尽管该量表需要进一步测试以确定其可靠性和有效性,但这些初步结果表明,该量表可能是一种心理测量学上合理的工具,可用于衡量家庭对晚期癌症护理的满意度。

相似文献

1
Validity and reliability testing of the FAMCARE Scale: measuring family satisfaction with advanced cancer care.FAMCARE量表的效度和信度测试:衡量家庭对晚期癌症护理的满意度。
Soc Sci Med. 1993 Mar;36(5):693-701. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(93)90066-d.
2
The Use of a Brief 5-Item Measure of Family Satisfaction as a Critical Quality Indicator in Advanced Cancer Care: A Multisite Comparison.在晚期癌症护理中使用简短的5项家庭满意度量表作为关键质量指标:多中心比较
J Palliat Med. 2017 Jul;20(7):716-721. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2016.0442. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
3
The FAMCARE-Patient scale: measuring satisfaction with care of outpatients with advanced cancer.FAMCARE-患者量表:测量晚期癌症门诊患者对护理的满意度。
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Dec;45(18):3182-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.09.003. Epub 2009 Sep 26.
4
Translation and Testing of the Italian Version of FAMCARE-2: Measuring Family Caregivers' Satisfaction With Palliative Care.FAMCARE-2 意大利版的翻译与测试:测量姑息治疗中家庭护理者的满意度。
J Fam Nurs. 2017 May;23(2):252-272. doi: 10.1177/1074840717697538. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
5
Translation and Validation of the 10-Item FAMCARE Scale to Assess Satisfaction of Family Caregivers With Care Given to Cancer Patients.将 10 项 FAMCARE 量表翻译并验证为评估癌症患者家庭护理者对所提供护理的满意度。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 Nov;58(5):878-885.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.07.018. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
6
Psychometric Properties of the Patients' Satisfaction Instrument FAMCARE-P13 in a Palliative Care Unit.姑息治疗病房中患者满意度量表FAMCARE-P13的心理测量学特性
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2017 Aug;34(7):597-602. doi: 10.1177/1049909116645511. Epub 2016 Apr 21.
7
Use of an Item Bank to Develop Two Short-Form FAMCARE Scales to Measure Family Satisfaction With Care in the Setting of Serious Illness.使用题库开发两个简版FAMCARE量表,以衡量重病背景下家庭对护理的满意度。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015 May;49(5):894-903.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.10.017. Epub 2014 Dec 27.
8
Caregiver satisfaction with out-patient oncology services: utility of the FAMCARE instrument and development of the FAMCARE-6.照顾者对门诊肿瘤服务的满意度:FAMCARE 工具的效用和 FAMCARE-6 的开发。
Support Care Cancer. 2011 Apr;19(4):565-72. doi: 10.1007/s00520-010-0858-1. Epub 2010 Mar 28.
9
Reliability testing of the FAMCARE-2 scale: measuring family carer satisfaction with palliative care.FAMCARE-2 量表的信度测试:测量家庭护理人员对姑息治疗的满意度。
Palliat Med. 2010 Oct;24(7):674-81. doi: 10.1177/0269216310373166. Epub 2010 Jul 9.
10
Measuring patient satisfaction in oncology palliative care: psychometric properties of the FAMCARE-patient scale.评估肿瘤姑息治疗中的患者满意度:FAMCARE-患者量表的心理测量特性。
Qual Life Res. 2009 Aug;18(6):747-52. doi: 10.1007/s11136-009-9494-y. Epub 2009 Jun 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Sustainability of a Nurse-Led End of Life (PEACH) Community Model of Care.由护士主导的临终关怀(PEACH)社区护理模式的可持续性。
J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2025 Aug 22;27(5):E225-34. doi: 10.1097/NJH.0000000000001143.
2
Satisfaction with Care Received at the End of Life in Portugal: A Systematic Review.葡萄牙临终关怀满意度:一项系统评价
Nurs Rep. 2025 Jun 18;15(6):221. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15060221.
3
Measuring the quality of patient-provider relationships in serious illness: A scoping review.衡量重症患者与医疗服务提供者关系的质量:一项范围综述。
Palliat Med. 2025 Mar;39(3):332-345. doi: 10.1177/02692163251315304. Epub 2025 Feb 6.
4
Practices for Reporting Scale Structure and Summarizing Scores in Studies Using FAMCARE Scale to Assess Caregiver Satisfaction with Cancer Care: A Scoping Review.使用FAMCARE量表评估照顾者对癌症护理满意度的研究中报告量表结构和总结分数的实践:一项范围综述
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2024 Nov 8;15:271-286. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S479195. eCollection 2024.
5
Factorial structure of quality of life, satisfaction with caregiving and caregiver burden in palliative care: A systematic review.在姑息治疗中,生活质量、护理满意度和护理者负担的因子结构:系统评价。
Nurs Open. 2024 Jan;11(1):e2067. doi: 10.1002/nop2.2067.
6
Enhancing the Adult and Paediatric Palliative Care System: Spanish Professionals' and Family Caregivers' Suggestions for Comprehensive Improvement.加强成人和儿童姑息治疗体系:西班牙专业人员及家庭护理人员提出的全面改进建议
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Dec 27;12(1):65. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12010065.
7
The Quick FICS: 5 and 10 Item Versions of the Family Inpatient Communication Survey.快速家庭住院沟通量表:家庭住院沟通调查的 5 项和 10 项版本。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 Oct;66(4):e461-e468. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.06.020. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
8
Quality of Dying and Death of Patients With Cancer in Hospice Care in Uganda.乌干达临终关怀中癌症患者的临终和死亡质量。
JCO Glob Oncol. 2023 Jan;9:e2200386. doi: 10.1200/GO.22.00386.
9
Traumatic stress symptoms in family caregivers of patients with acute leukaemia: protocol for a multisite mixed methods, longitudinal, observational study.急性白血病患者家属创伤后应激症状的多中心混合方法、纵向、观察性研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 4;12(11):e065422. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065422.
10
Outpatient palliative care referral system (PCRS) for patients with advanced cancer: an impact evaluation protocol.晚期癌症患者的门诊姑息治疗转介系统(PCRS):影响评估方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Oct 28;12(10):e059410. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059410.