de Melker R A
Department of General Practice, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Br J Gen Pract. 1993 Jan;43(366):22-4.
The aim of this study was to determine the value of pneumatic otoscopy in diagnosing otitis media with effusion in primary care. Pneumatic otoscopy was carried out for 111 children aged one to 16 years and the results obtained compared with those obtained from tympanometry. The children were those who had attended for a regular ear, nose and throat check up in the health centre of a school for the deaf during the period November 1989 to January 1990. Pneumatic otoscopy and tympanometry with the GSI 28 instrument (Grason-Stadler) were carried out by a trained ear, nose and throat nurse. All relevant features determined using otoscopy--the colour, position and mobility of the tympanum--and an overall assessment were recorded. The results of tympanometry were evaluated independently of the otoscopic findings. In the population examined the predictive values of positive and negative results of pneumatic otoscopy for diagnosing effusion were high; the sensitivity was low. Serious retraction of the eardrum and absence of mobility under positive pressure were the most predictive features but the colour of the tympanum did not show any relation to effusion. In the youngest age group (one to five years) 56% of the children had abnormal otoscopic findings in either one or both ears (odds ratio for this group versus remaining children 3.75; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.75 to 15.2). The odds ratios of past and present history of upper respiratory tract infection with respect to abnormal results from otoscopy were 2.41 (95% CI 1.05 to 5.53) and 2.95 (95% CI 1.17 to 7.45), respectively. Pneumatic otoscopy carried out by an experienced health care worker is of high diagnostic value when compared with the results of tympanometry. Pneumatic otoscopy can improve the diagnostic capabilities of general practitioners and other primary care workers with regard to otitis media with effusion.
本研究的目的是确定在初级保健中,鼓气耳镜检查对诊断分泌性中耳炎的价值。对111名1至16岁的儿童进行了鼓气耳镜检查,并将所得结果与鼓室导抗图检查结果进行比较。这些儿童是在1989年11月至1990年1月期间到一所聋哑学校的健康中心进行定期耳鼻喉检查的。由一名训练有素的耳鼻喉护士使用GSI 28仪器(Grason-Stadler)进行鼓气耳镜检查和鼓室导抗图检查。记录使用耳镜检查确定的所有相关特征——鼓膜的颜色、位置和活动度——以及总体评估。鼓室导抗图检查结果的评估独立于耳镜检查结果。在所检查的人群中,鼓气耳镜检查诊断积液的阳性和阴性结果的预测价值较高;敏感性较低。鼓膜严重内陷和正压下无活动度是最具预测性的特征,但鼓膜颜色与积液无任何关系。在最年幼的年龄组(1至5岁)中,56%的儿童一只或两只耳朵的耳镜检查结果异常(该组与其余儿童相比的优势比为3.75;95%置信区间(CI)为1.75至15.2)。上呼吸道感染既往史和现病史相对于耳镜检查异常结果的优势比分别为2.41(95%CI为1.05至5.53)和2.95(95%CI为1.17至7.45)。与鼓室导抗图检查结果相比,由经验丰富的医护人员进行的鼓气耳镜检查具有较高的诊断价值。鼓气耳镜检查可以提高全科医生和其他初级保健人员对分泌性中耳炎的诊断能力。