Kicklighter J R, Stein M A
Diabetes Educ. 1993 Jan-Feb;19(1):40-6. doi: 10.1177/014572179301900108.
Factors related to diabetic clients' abilities to read and comprehend printed diabetic diet material were explored by collecting data on social and demographic variables, prior knowledge, reading ability (using the Nelson-Denny Test), and comprehension of the diet (using the cloze technique) from 58 outpatient diabetic clients. A mean estimated reading grade level of 8.9 was obtained for the printed material, based on the use of three readability formulas. Analysis of cloze scores revealed that 62% of the clients scored less than 40%, indicating that the material was too difficult for them to comprehend; 21% scored between 40% and 59%, suggesting the need for supplemental instruction; and 17% scored 60% or above, indicating ability to fully comprehend. Clients scoring less than 40% tended to be older and obtained lower scores on the Nelson-Denny, as compared with those in the highest cloze category. Results of a stepwise regression analysis indicated that the Nelson-Denny vocabulary score, client age, and duration of diabetes were the strongest predictor variables for comprehension of the diet material.
通过收集58名门诊糖尿病患者的社会和人口统计学变量、先验知识、阅读能力(使用纳尔逊-丹尼测试)以及饮食理解能力(使用补缺测解法)的数据,探讨了与糖尿病患者阅读和理解印刷版糖尿病饮食材料能力相关的因素。基于三种可读性公式,该印刷材料的平均估计阅读年级水平为8.9。补缺测试分数分析显示,62%的患者得分低于40%,表明材料对他们来说太难理解;21%的患者得分在40%至59%之间,表明需要补充指导;17%的患者得分60%或以上,表明有完全理解的能力。与补缺测试得分最高组的患者相比,得分低于40%的患者往往年龄较大,且在纳尔逊-丹尼测试中得分较低。逐步回归分析结果表明,纳尔逊-丹尼词汇分数、患者年龄和糖尿病病程是饮食材料理解能力最强的预测变量。