Oliver C, Murphy G, Crayton L, Corbett J
Institute of Psychiatry, University of London, England.
J Autism Dev Disord. 1993 Mar;23(1):91-109. doi: 10.1007/BF01066421.
Operant and biological theories of the cause of self-injurious behavior (SIB) in people with a mental handicap are often viewed as mutually exclusive. In this single case study, interactions between features of Rett syndrome and operant conditioning as determinants of SIB are examined. Functional analysis by analog methodology indicated different functions for two forms of SIB shown by the subject: automatic reinforcement by sensory stimulation and escape from social interactions. It is suggested that features of Rett syndrome established conditions under which operant conditioning of self-injurious responding was maximized. The implications of this interaction between features of syndromes and operant conditioning for the conceptualization of the cause of SIB are discussed and it is proposed that the notion of a unitary cause of SIB is inappropriate. It is more productive to consider operant conditioning as the process that maintains responding against a background of predisposing and mediating factors which may be biologically determined.
智力障碍者自我伤害行为(SIB)成因的操作性理论和生物学理论通常被视为相互排斥的。在这个单病例研究中,我们考察了雷特综合征的特征与操作性条件作用之间的相互作用,将其作为自我伤害行为的决定因素。通过模拟方法进行的功能分析表明,该受试者表现出的两种自我伤害行为形式具有不同的功能:通过感觉刺激实现自动强化以及逃避社交互动。研究表明,雷特综合征的特征建立了条件,在这些条件下,自我伤害反应的操作性条件作用得以最大化。讨论了综合征特征与操作性条件作用之间这种相互作用对自我伤害行为成因概念化的影响,并提出自我伤害行为单一成因的概念是不合适的。将操作性条件作用视为在可能由生物学决定的易感和中介因素背景下维持反应的过程,会更有成效。