• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

陶瓷嵌体、其牙釉质对应物以及粘结水门汀的磨损

Wear of ceramic inlays, their enamel antagonists, and luting cements.

作者信息

Krejci I, Lutz F, Reimer M, Heinzmann J L

机构信息

Department of Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology, and Cariology, Zurich University Dental Institute, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Prosthet Dent. 1993 Apr;69(4):425-30. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(93)90192-q.

DOI:10.1016/0022-3913(93)90192-q
PMID:8463974
Abstract

The wear of ceramic inlay materials and antagonist enamel cups was measured in vitro. Per group, six MOD inlays were adhesively cemented in extracted molars. Castable glass ceramic, pressed glass ceramic, and feldspathic porcelain were used as inlay materials. A microfilled and a fine hybrid composite served as luting agents. The restorations were exposed to an in vitro wear test that corresponds to approximately 5 years of clinical service. The wear in the occlusal contact area was quantified during and at the end of the test with a three-dimensional scanner. Final wear measurements on the inlays (mean +/- SD) ranged from 21.8 +/- 8.8 microns for pressed glass ceramic to 59.0 +/- 37.9 microns for castable glass ceramic. The mean wear of the enamel antagonists ranged from 74.6 +/- 32.9 microns for pressed glass ceramic to 153.2 +/- 61.5 microns for feldspathic porcelain. The wear of the luting composites at the end of the test ranged from 4.9 +/- 5.1 microns for microfilled to 12.3 +/- 6.3 microns for fine hybrid.

摘要

在体外测量了陶瓷嵌体材料和对抗性牙釉质杯的磨损情况。每组将六个MOD嵌体粘结固定在拔除的磨牙上。使用可铸玻璃陶瓷、压制玻璃陶瓷和长石质瓷作为嵌体材料。一种微填料复合树脂和一种精细混合复合树脂用作粘结剂。这些修复体接受了相当于约5年临床使用的体外磨损试验。在试验期间和试验结束时,使用三维扫描仪对咬合接触区域的磨损进行量化。嵌体的最终磨损测量值(平均值±标准差)范围为:压制玻璃陶瓷为21.8±8.8微米,可铸玻璃陶瓷为59.0±37.9微米。牙釉质对抗体的平均磨损范围为:压制玻璃陶瓷为74.6±32.9微米,长石质瓷为153.2±61.5微米。试验结束时,粘结复合树脂的磨损范围为:微填料复合树脂为4.9±5.1微米,精细混合复合树脂为12.3±6.3微米。

相似文献

1
Wear of ceramic inlays, their enamel antagonists, and luting cements.陶瓷嵌体、其牙釉质对应物以及粘结水门汀的磨损
J Prosthet Dent. 1993 Apr;69(4):425-30. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(93)90192-q.
2
Wear of CAD/CAM ceramic inlays: restorations, opposing cusps, and luting cements.
Quintessence Int. 1994 Mar;25(3):199-207.
3
Wear and marginal adaptation of composite resin inlays.
J Prosthet Dent. 1994 Sep;72(3):233-44. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(94)90335-2.
4
Marginal adaptation and fit of adhesive ceramic inlays.
J Dent. 1993 Feb;21(1):39-46. doi: 10.1016/0300-5712(93)90048-u.
5
Antagonist enamel wears more than ceramic inlays.对抗牙釉质的磨损比陶瓷嵌体更多。
J Dent Res. 2006 Dec;85(12):1097-100. doi: 10.1177/154405910608501206.
6
Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.磨牙中复合树脂与陶瓷嵌体的强度和粘结力的三维有限元分析
J Prosthet Dent. 2008 Feb;99(2):131-40. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60029-3.
7
Adhesive luting of indirect restorations.间接修复体的粘结固位
Am J Dent. 2000 Nov;13(Spec No):60D-76D.
8
Marginal adaptation of four tooth-coloured inlay systems in vivo.
J Dent. 1992 Feb;20(1):18-26. doi: 10.1016/0300-5712(92)90004-v.
9
Three-year evaluation of computer-machined ceramic inlays: influence of luting agent.
Quintessence Int. 1998 Sep;29(9):573-82.
10
Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays after six years: wear of luting composites.六年后的白榴石增强玻璃陶瓷嵌体:粘结性复合材料的磨损
Oper Dent. 2000 Nov-Dec;25(6):466-72.

引用本文的文献

1
In Vivo Wear Analysis of Leucite-Reinforced Ceramic Inlays/Onlays After 14 Years.14年后白榴石增强陶瓷嵌体/高嵌体的体内磨损分析
Materials (Basel). 2025 Jul 23;18(15):3446. doi: 10.3390/ma18153446.
2
Clinical Performance of Posterior Indirect Resin Composite Restorations with the Proximal Box Elevation Technique: A Prospective Clinical Trial up to 3 Years.采用近中邻面盒形扩展技术的后牙间接复合树脂修复体的临床效果:3 年前瞻性临床试验。
J Adhes Dent. 2024 Jan 26;26:19-30. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.b4908449.
3
A Comparative Evaluation of Enamel Wear Against Different Surface Finished Ceramics: An In Vitro Study.
不同表面光洁度陶瓷的釉质磨损比较评估:一项体外研究
Cureus. 2023 Sep 4;15(9):e44689. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44689. eCollection 2023 Sep.
4
2D and 3D Wear Analysis of 3D Printed and Prefabricated Artificial Teeth.3D 打印和预制人工牙的 2D 和 3D 磨损分析。
Int Dent J. 2023 Feb;73(1):87-92. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2022.10.002. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
5
Evaluating the Wear of Resin Teeth by Different Opposing Restorative Materials.评估不同对颌修复材料对树脂牙的磨损情况。
Materials (Basel). 2019 Nov 8;12(22):3684. doi: 10.3390/ma12223684.
6
Wear Resistance of 3D Printing Resin Material Opposing Zirconia and Metal Antagonists.3D打印树脂材料对抗氧化锆和金属对颌牙的耐磨性
Materials (Basel). 2018 Jun 20;11(6):1043. doi: 10.3390/ma11061043.
7
Assessment of exposures and potential risks to the US adult population from wear (attrition and abrasion) of gold and ceramic dental restorations.美国成年人口因金和陶瓷牙科修复体的磨损(磨耗和磨损)而面临的暴露和潜在风险评估。
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2016 Jan-Feb;26(1):70-7. doi: 10.1038/jes.2015.17. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
8
Are resin composites suitable replacements for amalgam? A study of two-body wear.树脂复合材料是否是汞合金的合适替代品?一项关于双体磨损的研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2015 Jul;19(6):1485-92. doi: 10.1007/s00784-014-1373-4. Epub 2014 Dec 10.
9
Dental materials for primary dentition: are they suitable for occlusal restorations? A two-body wear study.乳牙列的牙科材料:它们适用于咬合修复吗?一项双体磨损研究。
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2015 Apr;16(2):165-72. doi: 10.1007/s40368-014-0151-y. Epub 2014 Oct 25.
10
Adhesive restoration of anterior endodontically treated teeth: influence of post length on fracture strength.牙髓治疗后前牙的粘结修复:桩长度对断裂强度的影响。
Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18(2):545-54. doi: 10.1007/s00784-013-0978-3. Epub 2013 Apr 20.