• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A multicenter comparison of isradipine and felodipine in the treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension. The Physician's Study Group.

作者信息

Cutler S A, Hammond J J

机构信息

Clinical Research Department Sandoz Australia, North Ryde, New South Wales.

出版信息

Am J Hypertens. 1993 Mar;6(3 Pt 2):44S-48S. doi: 10.1093/ajh/6.3.44s.

DOI:10.1093/ajh/6.3.44s
PMID:8466725
Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the tolerability of isradipine and felodipine in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. Following a 4-week placebo run-in, 143 patients entered a 12-week double-blind multicenter study. Patients were randomized to receive either isradipine (n = 72) or felodipine (n = 71) at a dose of 2.5 mg twice daily. Dose-doubling and the addition of enalapril (2.5 mg once daily) was permitted if diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was > 90 mm Hg at weeks 4 and 8, respectively. Isradipine reduced blood pressure from 165/104 +/- 13/6 mm Hg at baseline to 144/88 +/- 13/8 mm Hg at week 12 (P < .001) whereas felodipine reduced blood pressure from 171/104 +/- 17/6 mm Hg at baseline to 150/92 +/- 19/9 mm Hg at week 12 (P < .001). Similar incidences of headache, flushing, dizziness and tachycardia were reported in both groups. However, the incidence of ankle edema was significantly lower in the isradipine group (14% v 30%) (P = .028). It is concluded that isradipine represents a practical improvement over felodipine in the treatment of hypertension.

摘要

相似文献

1
A multicenter comparison of isradipine and felodipine in the treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension. The Physician's Study Group.
Am J Hypertens. 1993 Mar;6(3 Pt 2):44S-48S. doi: 10.1093/ajh/6.3.44s.
2
A comparison of isradipine and felodipine in Australian patients with hypertension: focus on ankle oedema. The Physician's Study Group.澳大利亚高血压患者中伊拉地平与非洛地平的比较:关注踝部水肿。医师研究小组。
Blood Press. 1993 Sep;2(3):205-11. doi: 10.3109/08037059309077552.
3
Amlodipine, felodipine, and isradipine in the treatment of Chinese patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension.氨氯地平、非洛地平和伊拉地平治疗中国轻至中度高血压患者的疗效观察
Clin Ther. 1998 Nov-Dec;20(6):1159-69. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(98)80111-2.
4
Long-term efficacy, tolerability, and safety of the combination of enalapril and felodipine ER in the treatment of hypertension. Enalapril-Felodipine ER Factorial Study Group.依那普利与非洛地平缓释片联合治疗高血压的长期疗效、耐受性及安全性。依那普利-非洛地平缓释片析因研究组。
Clin Ther. 1998 May-Jun;20(3):527-38. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(98)80062-3.
5
Efficacy and tolerability of extended-release felodipine and extended-release nifedipine in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension.缓释非洛地平和缓释硝苯地平治疗轻至中度原发性高血压患者的疗效及耐受性
Clin Ther. 1994 Jul-Aug;16(4):634-46.
6
Improved efficacy with maintained tolerability in the treatment of primary hypertension. Comparison between the felodipine-metoprolol combination tablet and monotherapy with enalapril. Swedish Multicentre Group.非洛地平-美托洛尔复方片剂与依那普利单药治疗原发性高血压的疗效比较:疗效提高且耐受性良好。瑞典多中心研究组
J Hum Hypertens. 1999 Jan;13(1):55-60. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1000724.
7
Comparison of felodipine and enalapril monotherapy in essential hypertension.非洛地平与依那普利单药治疗原发性高血压的比较。
Blood Press. 1993 Mar;2(1):53-8. doi: 10.3109/08037059309077527.
8
Comparison and interaction of low dose felodipine and enalapril in the treatment of essential hypertension in elderly subjects.小剂量非洛地平与依那普利治疗老年原发性高血压的比较及相互作用
Am J Hypertens. 1992 Apr;5(4 Pt 1):238-43. doi: 10.1093/ajh/5.4.238.
9
Felodipine-metoprolol combination tablet: a valuable option to initiate antihypertensive therapy?非洛地平-美托洛尔复方片剂:启动抗高血压治疗的一个有价值的选择?
Am J Hypertens. 1999 Sep;12(9 Pt 1):915-20. doi: 10.1016/s0895-7061(99)00067-9.
10
A comparative study of isradipine SRO and enalapril in black patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension.伊拉地平缓释片与依那普利治疗黑人轻至中度高血压的对比研究。
Am J Hypertens. 1993 Mar;6(3 Pt 2):80S-81S. doi: 10.1093/ajh/6.3.80s.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of blood pressure control with amlodipine and controlled-release isradipine: an open-label, drug substitution study.氨氯地平和控释异搏定在血压控制方面的比较:一项开放标签的药物替代研究。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2005 Apr;7(4 Suppl 1):27-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2005.04450.x.
2
At equipotent doses, isradipine is better tolerated than amlodipine in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension: a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study.在等效剂量下,对于轻至中度高血压患者,伊拉地平的耐受性优于氨氯地平:一项双盲、随机、平行组研究。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1994 Oct;38(4):335-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1994.tb04363.x.
3
Isradipine. An update of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension.
伊拉地平。其药效学、药代动力学特性及治疗轻至中度高血压疗效的最新进展。
Drugs. 1995 Apr;49(4):618-49. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199549040-00009.