Kline D G, Happel L T
Department of Neurosurgery, LSU School of Medicine, New Orleans.
Can J Neurol Sci. 1993 Feb;20(1):3-10. doi: 10.1017/s0317167100047338.
The rationale, basic considerations, and technique of intraoperative nerve action potential (NAP) recording have been reviewed. Experience using this technique in several thousand patients over a 25 year period has been summarized. The most frequent serious nerve injury is one that leaves it in continuity. Resection of such a lesion that is regenerating does the patient a great disservice as does exploration without repair of one with little or no potential for useful spontaneous recovery. The frequency of lesions in continuity as well as the difficulties in evaluating them in the early months by electromyography let alone by surgical inspection has led to the development of intraoperative NAP recording. Where neurolysis was based on a recordable NAP across a lesion in continuity, 93% recovered good function. Where resection of the lesion was based on absence of an NAP, the injury was, without exception, neurotmetic and/or one with poor potential for useful recovery without repair. Some lesions had an NAP across their lesion but a portion of the cross-sectional area appeared more seriously injured. By use of NAP recordings, a split repair was done and usually with good results.
术中神经动作电位(NAP)记录的基本原理、注意事项及技术已被综述。总结了在25年期间数千例患者中使用该技术的经验。最常见的严重神经损伤是神经保持连续性的损伤。切除正在再生的此类病变对患者极为不利,就像探查那些几乎没有或没有自发恢复可能的病变却不进行修复一样。连续性病变的发生率以及在早期几个月通过肌电图评估它们的困难,更不用说通过手术检查评估了,这导致了术中NAP记录技术的发展。在基于连续性病变处可记录的NAP进行神经松解的情况下,93%的患者恢复了良好功能。在基于无NAP而切除病变的情况下,损伤无一例外是神经横断性的和/或不修复就几乎没有恢复可能的损伤。一些病变在其病变处有NAP,但部分横截面积似乎损伤更严重。通过使用NAP记录,进行了分层修复,通常效果良好。