Samet J H, Burstin H R, Green J, Singer D E
Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, MA.
Ann Emerg Med. 1993 May;22(5):813-8. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)80797-8.
To evaluate an emergency department's "treat and transfer" policy during a two-month period of reduced inpatient capacity by determining the number and characteristics of transferred patients not admitted as planned to the receiving hospital.
Matched case-control analysis.
Public hospital adult ED.
Patients transferred to other hospitals for admission.
None.
Twelve percent of patients (16 of 135) were not admitted after transfer during the first month, and 8% during the two-month period. Only IV drug use was found to be significantly associated with an increased risk of discharge without admission (odds ratio = 9.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.9 to 47.8).
Patients transferred from the public hospital ED resulted in admission to the receiving hospital in 92% of transfers. A history of IV drug use was the only characteristic found to be associated with discharge without admission to the accepting hospital.
通过确定未按计划入住接收医院的转院患者数量及特征,评估在住院能力降低的两个月期间急诊科的“治疗并转院”政策。
匹配病例对照分析。
公立医院成人急诊科。
转至其他医院住院的患者。
无。
第一个月转院后有12%的患者(135例中的16例)未被收治,两个月期间这一比例为8%。仅发现静脉吸毒与未收治即出院风险增加显著相关(比值比=9.5;95%置信区间,1.9至47.8)。
从公立医院急诊科转出的患者中,92%的转院患者入住了接收医院。静脉吸毒史是唯一被发现与未入住接收医院即出院相关的特征。