• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Detection of temporal gaps in sinusoids: effects of frequency and level.

作者信息

Moore B C, Peters R W, Glasberg B R

机构信息

Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge, England.

出版信息

J Acoust Soc Am. 1993 Mar;93(3):1563-70. doi: 10.1121/1.406815.

DOI:10.1121/1.406815
PMID:8473610
Abstract

Thresholds for the detection of gaps in sinusoidal signals were measured as a function of frequency (100-2000 Hz) and level (25-85 dB SPL) in 11 normally hearing subjects. The sinusoids were presented in a background noise intended to mask spectral splatter associated with the gap. In a separate experiment, auditory filter shapes and detection efficiency were estimated for the same 11 subjects using the notched-noise method, at center frequencies of 100, 200, 400, and 800 Hz. Gap thresholds varied only slightly with frequency over the range 400-2000 Hz, but increased markedly at 200 and 100 Hz. At all center frequencies, gap thresholds were almost invariant with level for levels above 55 dB SPL. Gap thresholds increased at low levels, reaching values about 50% greater than their asymptotic values at a sensation level of about 20 dB. The decrease in auditory filter bandwidth with decreasing center frequency does not seem sufficient to account for the increase in gap thresholds. Also, individual gap thresholds at a given center frequency were not significantly correlated with the bandwidth of the auditory filter at that center frequency, as would be expected if the auditory filter played a role in limiting gap detection. Detection efficiency decreased with decreasing center frequency. Individual differences in detection efficiency were significantly correlated with gap thresholds. However, changes in detection efficiency with frequency do not seem to be of the right form to account for the increase in gap thresholds at low frequencies. It seems likely that there is a central sliding temporal integrator which integrates over longer times at lower center frequencies.

摘要

相似文献

1
Detection of temporal gaps in sinusoids: effects of frequency and level.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1993 Mar;93(3):1563-70. doi: 10.1121/1.406815.
2
Detection of temporal gaps in sinusoids by elderly subjects with and without hearing loss.有听力损失和无听力损失的老年人对正弦波中时间间隙的检测。
J Acoust Soc Am. 1992 Oct;92(4 Pt 1):1923-32. doi: 10.1121/1.405240.
3
Effects of level and frequency on the detection of decrements and increments in sinusoids.水平和频率对正弦波中减量和增量检测的影响。
J Acoust Soc Am. 1995 Jun;97(6):3791-9. doi: 10.1121/1.412394.
4
Gap detection with sinusoids and noise in normal, impaired, and electrically stimulated ears.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1988 Mar;83(3):1093-101. doi: 10.1121/1.396054.
5
Detection of decrements and increments in sinusoids at high overall levels.在较高总体水平下检测正弦波中的衰减和增量。
J Acoust Soc Am. 1996 Jun;99(6):3669-77. doi: 10.1121/1.414964.
6
Gap detection as a function of frequency, bandwidth, and level.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1983 Aug;74(2):467-73. doi: 10.1121/1.389812.
7
The detection of temporal gaps as a function of frequency region and absolute noise bandwidth.作为频率区域和绝对噪声带宽函数的时间间隙检测。
J Acoust Soc Am. 1992 Feb;91(2):1069-77. doi: 10.1121/1.402633.
8
The influence of external and internal noise on the detection of increments and decrements in the level of sinusoids.
Hear Res. 2001 May;155(1-2):41-53. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5955(01)00244-1.
9
Gap detection in Mongolian gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus).蒙古沙鼠(长爪沙鼠)的间隙检测
Hear Res. 2003 Feb;176(1-2):11-6. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5955(02)00643-3.
10
Detection of temporal gaps in bandlimited noise: effects of variations in bandwidth and signal-to-masker ratio.带限噪声中时间间隙的检测:带宽和信号掩蔽比变化的影响
J Acoust Soc Am. 1985 Feb;77(2):635-9. doi: 10.1121/1.391881.

引用本文的文献

1
Gap pre-pulse inhibition of the cortical auditory evoked potentials as a possible objective tinnitus assessment tool.皮质听觉诱发电位的间隙前脉冲抑制作为一种可能的客观性耳鸣评估工具。
Iran J Child Neurol. 2023 Fall;17(4):117-136. doi: 10.22037/ijcn.v17i4.42300. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
2
80 Hz auditory steady state responses (ASSR) elicited by silent gaps embedded within a broadband noise.由宽带噪声中嵌入的静音间隙所引发的80赫兹听觉稳态反应(ASSR)。
Front Neurol. 2023 Jul 13;14:1221443. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1221443. eCollection 2023.
3
Within- and across-frequency temporal processing and speech perception in cochlear implant users.
人工耳蜗使用者的内频和跨频时间处理和言语感知。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 13;17(10):e0275772. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275772. eCollection 2022.
4
Behavioral effects of rhythm, carrier frequency and temporal cueing on the perception of sound sequences.节奏、载波频率和时线索对声音序列感知的行为影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 5;15(6):e0234251. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234251. eCollection 2020.
5
Neural tracking of the musical beat is enhanced by low-frequency sounds.低频声音增强了对音乐节拍的神经跟踪。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Aug 7;115(32):8221-8226. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1801421115. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
6
Gap Detection in School-Age Children and Adults: Center Frequency and Ramp Duration.学龄儿童和成人的间隙检测:中心频率和斜坡持续时间
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Jan 1;60(1):172-181. doi: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-H-16-0010.
7
The effect of noise fluctuation and spectral bandwidth on gap detection.噪声波动和频谱带宽对间隙检测的影响。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2016 Apr;139(4):1601. doi: 10.1121/1.4945095.
8
Evaluation of Temporal Difference Limen in Preoperative Non-Invasive Ear Canal Audiometry as a Predictive Factor for Speech Perception after Cochlear Implantation.术前非侵入性耳道测听中时间辨别阈作为人工耳蜗植入后言语感知预测因素的评估
Audiol Res. 2014 Feb 27;4(1):91. doi: 10.4081/audiores.2014.91. eCollection 2014 Mar 6.
9
The Gap Detection Test: Can It Be Used to Diagnose Tinnitus?间隙检测测试:它可用于诊断耳鸣吗?
Ear Hear. 2015 Jul-Aug;36(4):e138-45. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000156.
10
Auditory and tactile gap discrimination by observers with normal and impaired hearing.听力正常和听力受损观察者的听觉和触觉间隙辨别能力。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 Feb;135(2):838-50. doi: 10.1121/1.4861246.