Suppr超能文献

抑郁症诊断量表的区分效度。

Discriminant validity of the Inventory to Diagnose Depression.

作者信息

Haaga D A, McDermut W, Ahrens A H

机构信息

Department of Psychology, American University, Washington, DC 20016-8062.

出版信息

J Pers Assess. 1993 Apr;60(2):285-9. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6002_6.

Abstract

Measures of depression and anxiety correlate highly with one another. It has been hypothesized that this shared variance partly reflects poor discriminant validity, which could be improved by linking item content more closely to diagnostic criteria. We tested this speculation by comparing the Inventory to Diagnose Depression (Zimmerman, Coryell, Corenthal, & Wilson, 1986), developed to correspond with diagnostic criteria for major depression, with the Beck Depression Inventory (Beck, Rush, Shaw, & Emery, 1979) in terms of discriminant validity. These measures correlated more strongly with each other than with anxiety but did not differ in their relations with anxiety.

摘要

抑郁和焦虑的测量指标之间高度相关。据推测,这种共同的方差部分反映了较差的区分效度,通过使项目内容与诊断标准更紧密地联系起来,这种效度可能会得到提高。我们通过比较《抑郁诊断量表》(齐默尔曼、科里尔、科伦塔尔和威尔逊,1986年编制,旨在与重度抑郁的诊断标准相对应)和《贝克抑郁量表》(贝克、拉什、肖和埃默里,1979年编制)在区分效度方面的表现,来检验这一推测。这些测量指标之间的相关性比它们与焦虑的相关性更强,但在与焦虑的关系上并无差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验