Suppr超能文献

在人格评估量表上对伪装精神障碍的检测:一项判别分析

Detection of feigned mental disorders on the personality assessment inventory: a discriminant analysis.

作者信息

Rogers R, Sewell K W, Morey L C, Ustad K L

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of North Texas, Denton 76203-6587, USA.

出版信息

J Pers Assess. 1996 Dec;67(3):629-40. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6703_15.

Abstract

Psychological assessment with multiscale inventories is largely dependent on the honesty and forthrightness of those persons evaluated. We investigated the effectiveness of the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) in detecting participants feigning three specific disorders: schizophrenia, major depression, and generalized anxiety disorder. With a simulation design, we tested the PAI validity scales on 166 naive (undergraduates with minimal preparation) and 80 sophisticated (doctoral psychology students with 1 week preparation) participants. We compared their results to persons with the designated disorders: schizophrenia (n = 45), major depression (n = 136), and generalized anxiety disorder (n = 40). Although moderately effective with naive simulators, the validity scales evidenced only modest positive predictive power with their sophisticated counterparts. Therefore, we performed a two-stage discriminant analysis that yielded a moderately high hit rate (> 80%) that was maintained in the cross-validation sample, irrespective of the feigned disorder or the sophistication of the simulators.

摘要

使用多尺度量表进行心理评估在很大程度上依赖于被评估者的诚实和坦率。我们调查了人格评估量表(PAI)在检测假装患有三种特定障碍(精神分裂症、重度抑郁症和广泛性焦虑症)的参与者方面的有效性。通过模拟设计,我们在166名天真的参与者(准备很少的本科生)和80名经验丰富的参与者(有1周准备时间的心理学博士生)身上测试了PAI效度量表。我们将他们的结果与患有指定障碍的人进行比较:精神分裂症患者(n = 45)、重度抑郁症患者(n = 136)和广泛性焦虑症患者(n = 40)。虽然效度量表对天真的模拟者有一定效果,但对经验丰富的模拟者而言,其阳性预测力仅为中等水平。因此,我们进行了两阶段判别分析,得到了较高的命中率(> 80%),且在交叉验证样本中保持不变,无论假装的障碍类型或模拟者的经验如何。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验