Susini G, Pepi M, Sisillo E, Bortone F, Salvi L, Barbier P, Fiorentini C
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Milan, Italy.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1993 Apr;7(2):178-83. doi: 10.1016/1053-0770(93)90213-5.
In a retrospective study, 42 patients with acute cardiac tamponade due to pericardial effusion were evaluated following cardiac surgery, and the pericardial fluid was drained by one of two alternative methods: two-dimensional echocardiographic-guided pericardiocentesis (2D-echo) or subxiphoid surgical pericardiotomy. During the first period (from 1982 to 1986), one of the two methods was chosen by the treating physicians, whereas in the second period (from 1986 to 1991), 2D-echo-guided pericardiocentesis was the treatment of choice. Percutaneous pericardiocentesis was performed using local anesthesia in 29 patients. A Tuohy needle was inserted at the left xipho-costal junction and, when fluid was obtained, 6 mL of saline solution was injected during 2D-echo contrast monitoring, and a multiple-hole, 6F, 30-cm catheter was inserted by means of a guidewire and positioned into the posterior pericardium, as near as possible to the atrioventricular groove. Complete drainage of pericardial fluid by percutaneous pericardiocentesis was obtained in 26 patients (89%). This procedure also allowed the evacuation of posterior and loculated effusions. Complications included two right ventricular punctures, which were immediately recognized by 2D-echo contrast and produced no serious consequences. Sixteen patients who underwent surgical pericardiotomy had complete evacuation of pericardial fluid without major complications (two of them suffered atrial arrhythmias during the procedure). The average amount of fluid drained, as well as the localization of the effusions, were the same for both groups. 2D-echo-guided pericardiocentesis was found to be a useful, safe, and simple technique. It can be used as an alternative treatment to subxiphoid pericardiotomy for cardiac tamponade due to postoperative pericardial effusions.
在一项回顾性研究中,对42例心脏手术后因心包积液导致急性心脏压塞的患者进行了评估,并通过两种替代方法之一引流心包积液:二维超声心动图引导下心包穿刺术(2D-超声心动图)或剑突下外科心包切开术。在第一阶段(1982年至1986年),治疗医生选择两种方法之一,而在第二阶段(1986年至1991年),2D-超声心动图引导下心包穿刺术是首选治疗方法。29例患者采用局部麻醉进行经皮心包穿刺术。在左剑肋交界处插入一根Tuohy针,当抽出液体时,在二维超声心动图造影监测下注入6 mL盐溶液,然后通过导丝插入一根多孔、6F、30 cm的导管,并将其置于心包后部,尽可能靠近房室沟。26例患者(89%)通过经皮心包穿刺术实现了心包积液的完全引流。该操作还能排出后部和局限性积液。并发症包括两例右心室穿刺,通过二维超声心动图造影立即发现,未产生严重后果。16例行外科心包切开术的患者心包积液完全排出,无重大并发症(其中两例在手术过程中出现房性心律失常)。两组患者的平均引流量以及积液的定位相同。二维超声心动图引导下心包穿刺术是一种有用、安全且简单的技术。它可作为术后心包积液导致心脏压塞时剑突下心包切开术的替代治疗方法。