• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

地红霉素与米卡霉素治疗急性支气管炎或慢性支气管炎急性加重的临床疗效

Clinical efficacy of dirithromycin versus miocamycin in the treatment of acute bronchitis or acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.

作者信息

Pozzi E

机构信息

Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Turin, Italy.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993 Mar;31 Suppl C:153-8. doi: 10.1093/jac/31.suppl_c.153.

DOI:10.1093/jac/31.suppl_c.153
PMID:8478306
Abstract

A multicentre trial was carried out to compare the efficacy and safety of dirithromycin with miocamycin in the treatment of patients with acute bronchitis or acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. The study was a single-blind, randomized, parallel-group study. Dirithromycin was administered orally at a dosage of 500 mg once daily and miocamycin was administered orally at a dosage of 600 mg twice daily; the duration of therapy was five to seven days for both drugs. The results, in 161 assessable patients (78 taking dirithromycin; 83 taking miocamycin), show that dirithromycin and miocamycin have comparable efficacy and safety in the treatment of bronchitis caused by susceptible bacterial pathogens.

摘要

开展了一项多中心试验,比较地红霉素与米卡霉素治疗急性支气管炎或慢性支气管炎急性加重患者的疗效和安全性。该研究为单盲、随机、平行组研究。地红霉素口服给药,剂量为每日500mg,一次服用;米卡霉素口服给药,剂量为每日600mg,分两次服用;两种药物的治疗疗程均为5至7天。161例可评估患者(78例服用地红霉素;83例服用米卡霉素)的结果表明,地红霉素和米卡霉素在治疗由敏感细菌病原体引起的支气管炎方面具有相当的疗效和安全性。

相似文献

1
Clinical efficacy of dirithromycin versus miocamycin in the treatment of acute bronchitis or acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.地红霉素与米卡霉素治疗急性支气管炎或慢性支气管炎急性加重的临床疗效
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993 Mar;31 Suppl C:153-8. doi: 10.1093/jac/31.suppl_c.153.
2
A multicentre study comparing the safety and efficacy of dirithromycin with erythromycin in the treatment of bronchitis.一项比较地红霉素与红霉素治疗支气管炎安全性和有效性的多中心研究。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993 Mar;31 Suppl C:139-51. doi: 10.1093/jac/31.suppl_c.139.
3
Dirithromycin in the treatment of skin and skin structure infections.地红霉素治疗皮肤及皮肤结构感染
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993 Mar;31 Suppl C:159-68. doi: 10.1093/jac/31.suppl_c.159.
4
Clinical efficacy of dirithromycin in acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.地红霉素治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重期的临床疗效
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993 Mar;31 Suppl C:131-8. doi: 10.1093/jac/31.suppl_c.131.
5
Clinical efficacy of dirithromycin versus miocamycin in tonsillopharyngitis.地红霉素与米卡霉素治疗扁桃体咽炎的临床疗效比较
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993 Mar;31 Suppl C:103-9. doi: 10.1093/jac/31.suppl_c.103.
6
A comparison of 5 days of dirithromycin and 7 days of clarithromycin in acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis.地红霉素5天与克拉霉素7天治疗慢性支气管炎急性细菌感染的比较
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1995 Jul;36(1):173-83. doi: 10.1093/jac/36.1.173.
7
Comparative study of dirithromycin and azithromycin in the treatment of acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.地红霉素与阿奇霉素治疗慢性支气管炎急性细菌感染的对比研究
J Chemother. 1999 Apr;11(2):119-25. doi: 10.1179/joc.1999.11.2.119.
8
Five-day dirithromycin therapy is as effective as seven-day erythromycin therapy for acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.对于慢性支气管炎急性加重期,五日地红霉素疗法与七日红霉素疗法疗效相当。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1999 Apr;43(4):541-8. doi: 10.1093/jac/43.4.541.
9
A comparison of 5-day courses of dirithromycin and azithromycin in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.地红霉素与阿奇霉素治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期的5日疗程比较
Clin Ther. 2003 Feb;25(2):542-57. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(03)80095-4.
10
[Double-blind clinical trial comparing 5 days of dirithromycin versus 7 days of diacetylmidecamycin in acute bronchitis and acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis].[双盲临床试验比较地红霉素5天与麦迪霉素二乙酸酯7天治疗急性支气管炎和慢性支气管炎急性加重的疗效]
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 1997 Aug-Sep;15(7):357-60.

引用本文的文献

1
Dirithromycin. A review of its antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy.地红霉素。对其抗菌活性、药代动力学特性及治疗效果的综述。
Drugs. 1994 Oct;48(4):599-616. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199448040-00008.
2
Miocamycin. A review of its antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic potential.米卡霉素。对其抗菌活性、药代动力学特性及治疗潜力的综述。
Drugs. 1993 Oct;46(4):720-45. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199346040-00008.