• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[双盲临床试验比较地红霉素5天与麦迪霉素二乙酸酯7天治疗急性支气管炎和慢性支气管炎急性加重的疗效]

[Double-blind clinical trial comparing 5 days of dirithromycin versus 7 days of diacetylmidecamycin in acute bronchitis and acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis].

作者信息

Sacristán J A, Elviro J, García de Lomas J, Palomino-Nicás J, Sobradillo V, Sánchez Gascón F, Valencia A, Calbo F, Viejo J L, Zamarrón C, Coca E, Casado M A, García Pérez L E, Hernández J M

机构信息

Departamento de Investigación Cínica, Lilly S.A., Madrid.

出版信息

Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 1997 Aug-Sep;15(7):357-60.

PMID:9410047
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dirythromycin has several pharmacokinetic characteristics (long half life and high tissue concentrations) which suggest the possibility of administering shorter treatments than those conventionally used. The aim of this study was to determine and compare the efficacy of a 5 day treatment with dirythromycin once a day, versus diacetylmidecamycin twice a day over 7 days in the treatment of patients with acute bronchitis and acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.

METHODS

A parallel, multicentric, randomized, double blind clinical study was carried out in 8 Spanish hospitals.

RESULTS

One hundred seventy-four patients were included in the study, with 87 (80 evaluable) being randomly assigned to receive dirythromycin (500 mg/day over 5 days) and 87 (83 evaluable) diacetylmidecamycin (600 mg, twice daily over 7 days). A favorable symptomatic response (cure or improvement) was observed in 72/80 of the first group (90%) and in 74/83 (89.2%) of the second group. No statistically significant differences were found in the efficacy and safety between the two treatment groups in either the evaluable patients or on intention to treat analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that the administration of dirythromycin, once a day over 5 days, is as safe and effective as diacetylmidecamycin, twice a day over 7 days, in the treatment of acute bronchitis and acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.

摘要

背景

地红霉素具有多种药代动力学特征(半衰期长和组织浓度高),这表明有可能采用比传统治疗更短的疗程。本研究的目的是确定并比较每日一次服用地红霉素5天与每日两次服用麦迪霉素二乙胺酯7天治疗急性支气管炎和慢性支气管炎急性加重患者的疗效。

方法

在8家西班牙医院进行了一项平行、多中心、随机、双盲临床研究。

结果

174例患者纳入研究,其中87例(80例可评估)随机分配接受地红霉素治疗(500毫克/天,共5天),87例(83例可评估)接受麦迪霉素二乙胺酯治疗(600毫克,每日两次,共7天)。第一组80例中有72例(90%)出现了良好的症状反应(治愈或改善),第二组83例中有74例(89.2%)出现了良好的症状反应。在可评估患者或意向性分析中,两个治疗组在疗效和安全性方面均未发现统计学上的显著差异。

结论

本研究结果表明,在治疗急性支气管炎和慢性支气管炎急性加重方面,每日一次服用地红霉素5天与每日两次服用麦迪霉素二乙胺酯7天一样安全有效。

相似文献

1
[Double-blind clinical trial comparing 5 days of dirithromycin versus 7 days of diacetylmidecamycin in acute bronchitis and acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis].[双盲临床试验比较地红霉素5天与麦迪霉素二乙酸酯7天治疗急性支气管炎和慢性支气管炎急性加重的疗效]
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 1997 Aug-Sep;15(7):357-60.
2
A multicentre study comparing the safety and efficacy of dirithromycin with erythromycin in the treatment of bronchitis.一项比较地红霉素与红霉素治疗支气管炎安全性和有效性的多中心研究。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993 Mar;31 Suppl C:139-51. doi: 10.1093/jac/31.suppl_c.139.
3
Clinical efficacy of dirithromycin versus miocamycin in the treatment of acute bronchitis or acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.地红霉素与米卡霉素治疗急性支气管炎或慢性支气管炎急性加重的临床疗效
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993 Mar;31 Suppl C:153-8. doi: 10.1093/jac/31.suppl_c.153.
4
Five-day dirithromycin therapy is as effective as seven-day erythromycin therapy for acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.对于慢性支气管炎急性加重期,五日地红霉素疗法与七日红霉素疗法疗效相当。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1999 Apr;43(4):541-8. doi: 10.1093/jac/43.4.541.
5
Clinical efficacy of dirithromycin in acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.地红霉素治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重期的临床疗效
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993 Mar;31 Suppl C:131-8. doi: 10.1093/jac/31.suppl_c.131.
6
A comparison of 5-day courses of dirithromycin and azithromycin in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.地红霉素与阿奇霉素治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期的5日疗程比较
Clin Ther. 2003 Feb;25(2):542-57. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(03)80095-4.
7
A comparison of 5 days of dirithromycin and 7 days of clarithromycin in acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis.地红霉素5天与克拉霉素7天治疗慢性支气管炎急性细菌感染的比较
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1995 Jul;36(1):173-83. doi: 10.1093/jac/36.1.173.
8
Dirithromycin versus amoxiclav in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.
J Int Med Res. 1997 Jan-Feb;25(1):33-40. doi: 10.1177/030006059702500105.
9
Comparative study of dirithromycin and azithromycin in the treatment of acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.地红霉素与阿奇霉素治疗慢性支气管炎急性细菌感染的对比研究
J Chemother. 1999 Apr;11(2):119-25. doi: 10.1179/joc.1999.11.2.119.
10
Effectiveness of short-course therapy (5 days) with grepafloxacin in the treatment of acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.格帕沙星短程疗法(5天)治疗慢性支气管炎急性细菌感染的疗效
Clin Ther. 1999 Jan;21(1):172-88. doi: 10.1016/S0149-2918(00)88277-6.