• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对话中的空间视角采择

Spatial perspective-taking in conversation.

作者信息

Schober M F

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Graduate Faculty, New School for Social Research, New York, NY 10003.

出版信息

Cognition. 1993 Apr;47(1):1-24. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(93)90060-9.

DOI:10.1016/0010-0277(93)90060-9
PMID:8482069
Abstract

Speakers can describe the locations of objects from their own perspective ("on my left" or "on the left"), their addressee's ("on your right" or "on the right"), or some perspective that avoids choosing one or the other person ("closer to both of us"). This study shows that speakers set spatial perspectives differently with actual conversational partners than with the usually studied imaginary addressees. Speakers with partners tended to use more egocentric perspectives than solo speakers. Pairs varied idiosyncratically in the perspective-setting strategies they picked, but all engaged in the same collaborative process: talking until both were sure they had understood each other. When conversational roles switched, the new speakers allocated spatial perspectives with remarkable precision, taking their partners' perspectives just as often as the partner had taken theirs. Speakers were more explicit about whose perspective they were taking when they held the floor for only one description than when they gave many descriptions in a row.

摘要

说话者可以从自己的视角(“在我左边”或“在左边”)、听话者的视角(“在你右边”或“在右边”),或者避免选择这一方或另一方的某个视角(“离我们俩都更近”)来描述物体的位置。这项研究表明,与通常所研究的想象中的听话者相比,说话者与实际对话伙伴设定空间视角的方式有所不同。有伙伴的说话者比独自说话者更倾向于使用以自我为中心的视角。两人一组在他们选择的视角设定策略上各有特点,但都参与了相同的协作过程:交谈直到双方都确定彼此理解。当对话角色转换时,新的说话者能非常精确地分配空间视角,采用对方视角的频率与对方采用自己视角的频率一样。与连续给出多个描述相比,当说话者只进行一次描述并占据话语权时,他们会更明确地表明自己所采用的是谁的视角。

相似文献

1
Spatial perspective-taking in conversation.对话中的空间视角采择
Cognition. 1993 Apr;47(1):1-24. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(93)90060-9.
2
Flexible spatial perspective-taking: conversational partners weigh multiple cues in collaborative tasks.灵活的空间视角转换:对话伙伴在协作任务中权衡多种线索。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Sep 26;7:618. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00618. eCollection 2013.
3
Perspective-Taking in Referential Communication: Does Stimulated Attention to Addressees' Perspective Influence Speakers' Reference Production?指称性交流中的视角采择:对听话者视角的激发性关注会影响说话者的指称表达吗?
J Psycholinguist Res. 2019 Apr;48(2):257-288. doi: 10.1007/s10936-018-9602-7.
4
Modeling Reference Production as the Probabilistic Combination of Multiple Perspectives.将参考生成建模为多个视角的概率组合。
Cogn Sci. 2018 Jun;42 Suppl 4:974-1008. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12582. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
5
Influence of perspective and goals on reference production in conversation.会话中视角和目标对参照语生成的影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Aug;19(4):699-707. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0262-6.
6
Social and representational cues jointly influence spatial perspective-taking.社会线索和表征线索共同影响空间视角采择。
Cogn Sci. 2015 May;39(4):739-65. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12173. Epub 2014 Sep 22.
7
Do People Regard Robots as Human-Like Social Partners? Evidence From Perspective-Taking in Spatial Descriptions.人们将机器人视为类人社交伙伴吗?来自空间描述中视角采择的证据。
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 5;11:578244. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.578244. eCollection 2020.
8
Speakers' use of agency and visual context in spatial descriptions.说话者在空间描述中对施事和视觉语境的使用。
Cognition. 2020 Jan;194:104070. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104070. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
9
Stick or Switch: A Selection Heuristic Predicts when People Take the Perspective of Others or Communicate Egocentrically.坚持还是改变:一种选择启发式方法预测人们何时会站在他人角度思考或进行自我中心式交流。
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 20;11(7):e0159570. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159570. eCollection 2016.
10
Audience Design in Multiparty Conversation.多方会话中的受众设计
Cogn Sci. 2019 Aug;43(8):e12774. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12774.

引用本文的文献

1
Spontaneous perspective-taking in real-time language comprehension: evidence from eye-movements and grain of coordination.实时语言理解中的自发视角采择:来自眼动和协调粒度的证据。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 5;14(1):8031. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58699-z.
2
Investigating Linguistic Alignment in Collaborative Dialogue: A Study of Syntactic and Lexical Patterns in Middle School Students.探究协作对话中的语言对齐:对中学生句法和词汇模式的研究
Lang Speech. 2025 Mar;68(1):63-86. doi: 10.1177/00238309241234565. Epub 2024 Mar 28.
3
Individual Differences in Spatial Orientation Modulate Perspective Taking in Listeners.
空间定向的个体差异调节听众的视角采择。
J Cogn. 2023 Sep 1;6(1):52. doi: 10.5334/joc.321. eCollection 2023.
4
Seeing the World From Others' Perspective: 14-Month-Olds Show Altercentric Modulation Effects by Others' Beliefs.从他人视角看世界:14个月大的婴儿表现出受他人信念影响的以他人为中心的调节效应。
Open Mind (Camb). 2022 Feb 9;5:189-207. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00050. eCollection 2021.
5
What is Functional Communication? A Theoretical Framework for Real-World Communication Applied to Aphasia Rehabilitation.功能性沟通是什么?应用于失语症康复的现实世界沟通的理论框架。
Neuropsychol Rev. 2022 Dec;32(4):937-973. doi: 10.1007/s11065-021-09531-2.
6
Language and Movement Synchronization in Dyadic Psychotherapeutic Interaction - A Qualitative Review and a Proposal for a Classification.二元心理治疗互动中的语言与动作同步——一项定性综述及分类建议
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 22;12:696448. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.696448. eCollection 2021.
7
Do People Regard Robots as Human-Like Social Partners? Evidence From Perspective-Taking in Spatial Descriptions.人们将机器人视为类人社交伙伴吗?来自空间描述中视角采择的证据。
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 5;11:578244. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.578244. eCollection 2020.
8
What's New to You? Preschoolers' Partner-Specific Online Processing of Disfluency.对你来说有什么新鲜事?学龄前儿童对不流畅语言的特定伙伴在线处理
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 8;11:612601. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.612601. eCollection 2020.
9
From physical to social interactions: The relative entropy model.从物理相互作用到社会相互作用:相对熵模型。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jan 31;10(1):1565. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-58549-8.
10
The Impact of a Human Figure in a Scene on Spatial Descriptions in Speech, Gesture, and Gesture Alone.场景中人物对言语、手势及仅手势中的空间描述的影响。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2020 Feb;49(1):73-97. doi: 10.1007/s10936-019-09672-9.