Stewart B J, Archbold P G
Department of Family Nursing, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland 97201-3098.
Res Nurs Health. 1993 Feb;16(1):77-81. doi: 10.1002/nur.4770160110.
Ohis article is the second and concluding part of a discussion of the importance of sensitivity to change in selecting an outcome measure for a study evaluating a nursing intervention. In Part One of the discussion, (Stewart & Archbold, 1992) the relative lack of attention to measurement sensitivity in the nursing and measurement literature was described. Three factors to consider in selecting an outcome measure for an intervention study were reviewed: the conceptual link between the intervention and the outcome variable, the extent to which the outcome variable is amenable to change, and content validity. In Part Two, four additional factors are discussed: construct validity, distribution of scores on the outcome measure, reliability, and correlational stability over time.
本文是关于在评估护理干预措施的研究中选择结果指标时对变化敏感性重要性讨论的第二部分，也是结论部分。在讨论的第一部分（斯图尔特和阿奇博尔德，1992年）中，描述了护理和测量文献中对测量敏感性相对缺乏关注的情况。回顾了为干预研究选择结果指标时要考虑的三个因素：干预措施与结果变量之间的概念联系、结果变量可变化的程度以及内容效度。在第二部分中，讨论了另外四个因素：结构效度、结果指标得分的分布、信度以及随时间的相关性稳定性。
