Presson R G, Bezruczko A P, Hillier S C, McNiece W L
Department of Anesthesia, Riley Hospital for Children, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis 46202-5200.
Anesthesiology. 1993 May;78(5):974-80. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199305000-00023.
The tendency of intravenous fluid exiting the heat exchanger of a fluid warmer to cool to room temperature increases as the rate of infusion slows and the length of tubing between the heat exchanger and the patient increases. Thus, slow to moderate flow rates result in the delivery of fluid near room temperature despite the use of a fluid warmer. The volumes infused even at low flow rates may be large relative to the size of infants and children and may result in a significant decrease in patient temperature.
A new warmer (Hotline, Level 1 Technologies) that actively heats the fluid in the delivery tubing was evaluated and compared to two different conventional dry-wall warmers: the model DW1000A (Baxter Health Care) and the FloTem IIe (DataChem). Cold blood (4-10 degrees C) and room temperature saline (22 degrees C) were pumped through the warmers and the delivered temperature was measured as the flow rate was varied from 50 to 12,000 ml/h.
The Hotline was more effective than the Baxter or the FloTem IIe at flow rates between 50 and 6,000 ml/h for saline and at flow rates between 50 and 3,000 ml/h for blood. Insulating the tubing beyond the heat exchangers of the conventional warmers improved their performance, but the delivered temperatures were still less than those of the Hotline at low flow rates.
The Hotline is more effective than conventional warmers at slow flow rates, and may be useful for preventing hypothermia when large volumes of fluid relative to patient size are infused at slow rates.
随着输液速度减慢以及热交换器与患者之间的管路长度增加,静脉输液流出输液加温器的热交换器后冷却至室温的趋势会增强。因此,即使使用了输液加温器,中低速输液仍会导致接近室温的液体被输注。相对于婴幼儿的体型而言,即使是低流速输注的液体量也可能很大,这可能会导致患者体温显著下降。
对一种能主动加热输液管路中液体的新型加温器(热线加温器,一级技术公司)进行了评估,并与两种不同的传统干式壁式加温器进行比较:DW1000A型号(百特医疗保健公司)和FloTem IIe(数据化学公司)。将冷血(4 - 10摄氏度)和室温生理盐水(22摄氏度)泵入加温器,并在流速从50至12,000毫升/小时变化时测量输出温度。
对于生理盐水,在流速为50至6,000毫升/小时之间,以及对于血液,在流速为50至3,000毫升/小时之间,热线加温器比百特加温器或FloTem IIe更有效。对传统加温器热交换器之外的管路进行隔热处理可改善其性能,但在低流速时输出温度仍低于热线加温器。
在低流速情况下,热线加温器比传统加温器更有效,在以低流速输注相对于患者体型而言大量液体时,可能有助于预防体温过低。