Eades J A, Moore S, Pfullmann T, Hangas J
Center for Microanalysis of Materials, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801.
Microsc Res Tech. 1993 Apr 15;24(6):509-13. doi: 10.1002/jemt.1070240607.
We have found significant differences between the results of computer simulations of HOLZ line patterns. The computations in question are made in the kinematical approximation. After trivial errors are eliminated the programs fall into two groups. There is a discrepancy between the two that increases with distance from the zone axis. The difference is small but not negligible at the level of precision used in determining lattice parameters or strain. We show which of the two is correct in the kinematic approximation and that the discrepancy between the two groups is of the order of the error introduced by dynamical interaction.
我们发现了高阶劳厄带（HOLZ）线图案计算机模拟结果之间的显著差异。所讨论的计算是在运动学近似下进行的。消除微小误差后，程序分为两组。两组之间的差异随着与晶带轴距离的增加而增大。在用于确定晶格参数或应变的精度水平上，这种差异虽小但不可忽略。我们展示了在运动学近似下哪一组是正确的，并且两组之间的差异与动力学相互作用引入的误差量级相当。
