Lefer A M, Lefer D J
Department of Physiology, Jefferson Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107.
Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1993;33:71-90. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pa.33.040193.000443.
Endothelial dysfunction is an important early-recurring phenomenon in virtually all forms of ischemia-reperfusion, including a variety of circulatory shock states. The dysfunction appears to be triggered within 2.5 min of the endothelial generation of a large burst of superoxide radicals. However, the initial dysfunction may be amplified by neutrophil-generated factors including oxygen-derived free radicals, cytokines, proteases, and lipid mediators. Moreover, adhesive molecules on the surface of the PMN, along with their ligands on the endothelial cell membrane, appear to promote endothelial dysfunction in ways that may go beyond the adherence of neutrophils on the endothelial surface. These interactions remain to be elucidated but may involve intricate cell signaling pathways. A variety of pharmacologic agents exert endothelial protective effects in ischemia-reperfusion and circulatory shock states. Table 1 summarizes these agents and indicates the major mechanism of preservation of the endothelium. These substances can be classified into three broad categories: (a) substances replacing endogenous cytoprotective agents of endothelial origin including prostacyclin (PGI2), endothelium-derived relaxing factor (EDRF), and adenosine: the endothelium protecting agents include these substances as well as stable analogs of PGI2, and nitric oxide donors; (b) substances that inhibit pro-inflammatory mediators of endothelial origin: the pro-inflammatory agents are primarily platelet activating factor (PAF) and oxygen-derived free radicals (e.g. superoxide radicals) although other mediators may be involved. The therapeutic agents useful in this area are PAF receptor antagonists and free radical scavengers (e.g. superoxide dismutase); (c) substances that inhibit neutrophils or neutrophil-derived mediators: the major neutrophil-derived mediators are oxygen-derived free radicals, cytokines (e.g. TNF alpha and IL-1 beta), proteases (e.g. elastase), and lipid mediators (e.g. LTB4). In addition, adhesive molecules on the neutrophil surface and their endothelial ligands promote endothelial dysfunction and the action of adherent neutrophils. Agents that inhibit some of these mediators are transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta), elastase inhibitors, leukotriene B4 (LTB4) receptor antagonists and monoclonal antibodies to adhesive proteins (e.g. anti-CD18, anti-ICAM-1). Further work is needed to clarify these findings and to determine the physiologic and pathophysiologic interactions among these diverse agents. This topic of endothelial dysfunction represents a fertile area for further investigation to elucidate the complex mechanisms of neutrophil-endothelial interactions. These interactions lead to neutrophil adherence to the endothelium, neutrophil migration into the underlying tissues, and subsequent tissue injury (e.g. myocardial reperfusion injury).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
内皮功能障碍是几乎所有形式的缺血再灌注(包括各种循环性休克状态)中一种重要的早期反复出现的现象。这种功能障碍似乎在内皮细胞产生大量超氧阴离子自由基后的2.5分钟内被触发。然而,最初的功能障碍可能会被中性粒细胞产生的因子放大,这些因子包括氧衍生的自由基、细胞因子、蛋白酶和脂质介质。此外,中性粒细胞表面的黏附分子及其在内皮细胞膜上的配体,似乎以可能超出中性粒细胞在内皮表面黏附的方式促进内皮功能障碍。这些相互作用仍有待阐明,但可能涉及复杂的细胞信号通路。多种药物制剂在缺血再灌注和循环性休克状态下发挥内皮保护作用。表1总结了这些药物制剂,并指出了保护内皮的主要机制。这些物质可分为三大类:(a)替代内皮源性内源性细胞保护剂的物质,包括前列环素(PGI2)、内皮源性舒张因子(EDRF)和腺苷:内皮保护剂包括这些物质以及PGI2的稳定类似物和一氧化氮供体;(b)抑制内皮源性促炎介质的物质:促炎剂主要是血小板活化因子(PAF)和氧衍生的自由基(如超氧阴离子自由基),尽管可能涉及其他介质。在这一领域有用的治疗药物是PAF受体拮抗剂和自由基清除剂(如超氧化物歧化酶);(c)抑制中性粒细胞或中性粒细胞衍生介质的物质:主要的中性粒细胞衍生介质是氧衍生的自由基、细胞因子(如肿瘤坏死因子α和白细胞介素-1β)、蛋白酶(如弹性蛋白酶)和脂质介质(如白三烯B4)。此外,中性粒细胞表面的黏附分子及其内皮配体促进内皮功能障碍和黏附中性粒细胞的作用。抑制其中一些介质的药物制剂是转化生长因子-β(TGF-β)、弹性蛋白酶抑制剂、白三烯B4(LTB4)受体拮抗剂和抗黏附蛋白的单克隆抗体(如抗CD18、抗ICAM-1)。需要进一步的研究来阐明这些发现,并确定这些不同药物制剂之间的生理和病理生理相互作用。内皮功能障碍这一主题是一个有待进一步研究的丰富领域,以阐明中性粒细胞与内皮相互作用的复杂机制。这些相互作用导致中性粒细胞黏附于内皮、中性粒细胞迁移至下层组织以及随后的组织损伤(如心肌再灌注损伤)。(摘要截选至400字)