Rubin R H, Tolkoff-Rubin N E
Transplantation-Dialysis Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993 Apr;37(4):619-24. doi: 10.1128/AAC.37.4.619.
Since the early days of transplantation, infection has been a major consequence of antirejection immunosuppressive therapy. Increasingly effective prophylactic and preemptive strategies are being developed to prevent the infectious consequences of immunosuppressive therapy. Although the data base is incomplete and there remains a compelling need for well-designed, randomized, comparative trials, the potential for controlling life-threatening viral, bacterial, fungal, and protozoal infections exists. The cornerstone of this effort is the recognition that effective immunosuppressive strategies require an antimicrobial program to make them safe and that such an antimicrobial program needs to be individualized in order to be appropriately matched with the needs of the antirejection program. Thus, escalation and de-escalation of the antimicrobial program should be carried out to match the immunosuppressive program. Infection and rejection remain closely intertwined, linked by the immunosuppressive program that is prescribed.
自移植早期以来,感染一直是抗排斥免疫抑制治疗的主要后果。越来越有效的预防和抢先治疗策略正在被开发出来,以预防免疫抑制治疗的感染后果。尽管数据库并不完整,且仍然迫切需要设计良好的随机对照试验,但控制危及生命的病毒、细菌、真菌和原生动物感染的可能性是存在的。这项工作的基石是认识到有效的免疫抑制策略需要一个抗菌方案来确保其安全性,并且这样的抗菌方案需要个体化,以便与抗排斥方案的需求相匹配。因此,抗菌方案的升级和降级应与免疫抑制方案相匹配。感染和排斥仍然紧密交织,由所规定的免疫抑制方案联系在一起。