Mendez J C, Espy M J, Smith T F, Wilson J A, Paya C V
Division of Infectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Feb;36(2):526-30. doi: 10.1128/JCM.36.2.526-530.1998.
The availability of microbiologic methods that detect early replication of cytomegalovirus (CMV) posttransplantation will enhance the process of initiating preemptive antiviral therapy prior to the appearance of CMV disease. Using PCR techniques we sought to determine which region of the CMV genome present in peripheral blood leukocytes (PBLs) or serum provides the highest sensitivity for the detection of CMV posttransplantation. Blood samples were prospectively collected weekly for at least 8 weeks from a cohort of 21 consecutive liver transplant recipients not receiving anti-CMV prophylaxis. Results of PCR assays were correlated with recovery of CMV in cell cultures and histopathological findings from biopsy specimens of infected organs to assess clinical symptomatic infection. Of 148 specimens, primer pairs directed to the HindIII-X fragment region of CMV detected target DNA with a 94% sensitivity, compared to an 87% sensitivity with primer pairs directed to EcoRI fragment D, 32% sensitivity with primer pairs directed to the immediate-early antigen 1 gene (IEA1 gene), and 20% sensitivity with primer pairs directed to the major immediate-early (MIE) gene. The performance characteristics in terms of the sensitivity of primers for amplifying CMV DNA associated with symptomatic infection ranged from 100% (HindIII-X) to 20% (MIE gene); however, specificity was inversely related (HindIII-X, 45%; MIE gene, 91%) to primers directed to these gene targets. When HindIII-X and EcoRI-D primer sets were used, CMV DNA from PBLs was a more sensitive target than CMV DNA from serum for the early detection of symptomatic CMV infection (17 versus 12 days). Importantly, CMV DNA was not detected in five patients with no evidence of this viral infection. In conclusion, primers directed to the HindIII-X fragment region were the most optimal for the early detection of CMV DNA in PBLs and sera from symptomatic liver transplant recipients.
可用于检测移植后巨细胞病毒(CMV)早期复制的微生物学方法,将有助于在CMV疾病出现之前启动抢先抗病毒治疗的进程。我们运用聚合酶链反应(PCR)技术,试图确定外周血白细胞(PBL)或血清中CMV基因组的哪个区域,对移植后CMV的检测具有最高的灵敏度。前瞻性地每周收集连续21例未接受CMV预防治疗的肝移植受者的血样,至少持续8周。PCR检测结果与CMV在细胞培养中的回收情况以及感染器官活检标本的组织病理学结果相关联,以评估临床症状性感染。在148份标本中,针对CMV HindIII-X片段区域的引物对检测目标DNA的灵敏度为94%,而针对EcoRI片段D的引物对灵敏度为87%,针对立即早期抗原1基因(IEA1基因)的引物对灵敏度为32%,针对主要立即早期(MIE)基因的引物对灵敏度为20%。与症状性感染相关的用于扩增CMV DNA的引物灵敏度范围为100%(HindIII-X)至20%(MIE基因);然而,特异性与针对这些基因靶点的引物呈负相关(HindIII-X为45%;MIE基因为91%)。当使用HindIII-X和EcoRI-D引物组时,对于症状性CMV感染的早期检测,来自PBL的CMV DNA比来自血清的CMV DNA是更敏感的靶点(分别为17天和12天)。重要的是,在5例无这种病毒感染证据的患者中未检测到CMV DNA。总之,针对HindIII-X片段区域的引物对于有症状的肝移植受者的PBL和血清中CMV DNA的早期检测最为理想。