Wilson F C
Division of Orthopaedics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill 27599-7055.
Ann Thorac Surg. 1993 May;55(5):1345-8. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(93)90087-x.
This article describes the history and process of credentialing: accreditation of programs and certification of individual practitioners. Under accreditation, general (institutional) and discipline-specific requirements, both for residencies and fellowships, are considered, along with possible outcomes and the appeals mechanism for an unfavorable review. Under certification, the relationship between individual specialty boards and the American Board of Medical Specialties is defined, followed by a consideration of the principles underlying subspecialty certification and recertification. It is concluded that enforced standards of learning are one of the pillars of accountability upon which a profession must rest; that if medicine abdicates its responsibility to impose credible standards on itself, its place will be taken by very interested, but less knowledgeable, others; and that we must, therefore, rededicate ourselves to the requirement of reasonable standards as a professional obligation and use the best means possible to meet that responsibility.
项目认证以及个体从业者的证书颁发。在认证方面,会考虑住院医师培训项目和专科培训项目的一般(机构)要求以及特定学科要求,同时还会考虑可能的结果以及不利评审的申诉机制。在证书颁发方面,会明确个体专科委员会与美国医学专业委员会之间的关系,随后会探讨亚专科认证和再认证所依据的原则。得出的结论是,强制学习标准是一个专业必须赖以立足的问责支柱之一;如果医学放弃对自身施加可信标准的责任,那么其位置将被非常感兴趣但知识较少的其他方取代;因此,我们必须重新致力于将合理标准的要求作为一项专业义务,并尽最大可能履行这一责任。