Möller H J, Krokenberger M, von Zerssen D
Psychiatric Department, University Bonn, Federal Republic of Germany.
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1993;242(5):301-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02190390.
A study was carried out involving 134 neurotic-depressive inpatients (according to ICD-9) treated with cognitive behaviour therapy and in a subgroup additionally with antidepressants. Using standardized rating instruments, a large set of potential predictor variables was tested. After cross-validation according to the split-half technique, only very few of these proved to be suitable as predictors for the main outcome criteria. These predictors included certain aspects of social functioning before index admission, intensity of depressive symptoms at admission and the degree of self-evaluated mood disturbances three weeks after admission. Several predictors known from the literature could not be reproduced in this study, demonstrating the well-known instability of most predictor findings. On the other side, the predictor profile of the neurotic-depressive patients was quite similar to that found in endogenous depressives, a result which might--together with other findings, such as the response of neurotic depressives to antidepressants--question the traditional subclassification of functional depressive states into these subgroups.
一项研究对134名神经症性抑郁住院患者(根据国际疾病分类第九版)进行了认知行为疗法治疗,其中一个亚组还加用了抗抑郁药。使用标准化评分工具,对大量潜在预测变量进行了测试。根据对半分技术进行交叉验证后,结果表明这些变量中只有极少数适合作为主要结局标准的预测指标。这些预测指标包括入院前社会功能的某些方面、入院时抑郁症状的强度以及入院三周后自我评估的情绪障碍程度。文献中已知的几个预测指标在本研究中未能重现,这表明大多数预测结果具有众所周知的不稳定性。另一方面,神经症性抑郁患者的预测指标概况与内源性抑郁患者非常相似,这一结果可能——连同其他发现,如神经症性抑郁患者对抗抑郁药的反应——对功能性抑郁状态传统上分为这些亚组提出质疑。