• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

An evaluation of breastfeeding promotion literature: does it really promote breastfeeding?

作者信息

Valaitis R K, Shea E

机构信息

McMaster University School of Nursing, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Public Health. 1993 Jan-Feb;84(1):24-7.

PMID:8500052
Abstract

Breastfeeding pamphlets are being produced for new mothers by both commercial and nonprofit sources in increasing quantities. A regional lactation committee decided to evaluate these materials on the basis of accuracy, degree of positive approach to breastfeeding, readability and compliance with the WHO/UNICEF Code on the Marketing of Breast Milk Substitutes. Results indicate that materials produced by non-profit sources scored higher in positive approach accuracy and WHO Code compliance compared with commercial sources. Only 2 of 22 pamphlets in the sample were written within the recommended reading level of Grade 5-8. None of the materials met all of the criteria for good promotional breastfeeding literature.

摘要

相似文献

1
An evaluation of breastfeeding promotion literature: does it really promote breastfeeding?
Can J Public Health. 1993 Jan-Feb;84(1):24-7.
2
Do consumer infant feeding publications and products available in physicians' offices protect, promote, and support breastfeeding?
J Hum Lact. 1997 Sep;13(3):203-8. doi: 10.1177/089033449701300308.
3
Do baby-friendly hospitals influence breastfeeding duration on a national level?爱婴医院在国家层面上会影响母乳喂养时长吗?
Pediatrics. 2005 Nov;116(5):e702-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-0537.
4
Readability of printed sources of diet and health information.饮食与健康信息印刷资料的可读性。
Patient Educ Couns. 1996 Mar;27(2):123-34. doi: 10.1016/0738-3991(95)00829-2.
5
Readability of American Cancer Society patient education literature.美国癌症协会患者教育文献的可读性。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 1992 Jan-Feb;19(1):51-5.
6
The readability and suitability of sexual health promotion leaflets.性健康促进宣传册的可读性与适用性。
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Feb;99(2):284-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.09.003. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
7
Readability of patient education materials.患者教育材料的可读性。
Clin Ther. 1980;3(2):129-36.
8
Do health booklets add anything to professional guidance? An evaluation study.健康手册对专业指导有补充作用吗?一项评估研究。
Community Health Stud. 1984;8(2):210-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.1984.tb00445.x.
9
[The International Code of Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes : History, Content, and Significance].[《国际母乳代用品销售守则:历史、内容及意义》]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2018 Aug;61(8):1008-1011. doi: 10.1007/s00103-018-2765-4.
10
Readability of commercial versus generic health instructions for condoms.商业品牌与通用品牌避孕套健康说明的可读性
Health Care Women Int. 1990;11(3):295-304. doi: 10.1080/07399339009515899.

引用本文的文献

1
Marketing breastfeeding--reversing corporate influence on infant feeding practices.推广母乳喂养——扭转企业对婴儿喂养方式的影响
J Urban Health. 2008 Jul;85(4):486-504. doi: 10.1007/s11524-008-9279-6.
2
[Can patients read what we want them to read? Analysis of the readability of printed materials for health education].[患者能读懂我们希望他们读的内容吗?健康教育印刷材料的可读性分析]
Aten Primaria. 2003 Apr 30;31(7):409-14. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(03)79199-9.
3
Factors influencing the duration of breastfeeding in the Sudbury region.
影响萨德伯里地区母乳喂养时长的因素。
Can J Public Health. 1997 Jul-Aug;88(4):238-41. doi: 10.1007/BF03404789.
4
Randomised controlled trial assessing the effectiveness of a booklet on the duration of breast feeding.评估一本关于母乳喂养时长的手册有效性的随机对照试验。
Arch Dis Child. 1997 Jun;76(6):500-3; Discussion 503-4. doi: 10.1136/adc.76.6.500.
5
Strategies to support breastfeeding. Discarding myths and outdated advice.支持母乳喂养的策略。摒弃误区和过时建议。
Can Fam Physician. 1994 Oct;40:1775-81.