Suppr超能文献

在鼻咽抽吸物中检测呼吸道合胞病毒时,VIDAS呼吸道合胞病毒检测法、雅培呼吸道合胞病毒检测试剂盒与直接免疫荧光法的比较。

Comparison of the VIDAS RSV assay and the Abbott Testpack RSV with direct immunofluorescence for detection of respiratory syncytial virus in nasopharyngeal aspirates.

作者信息

Miller H, Milk R, Diaz-Mitoma F

机构信息

Regional Virology Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Canada.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1993 May;31(5):1336-8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.5.1336-1338.1993.

Abstract

The sensitivity and accuracy of the VIDAS RSV assay in testing fresh specimens were 82.7 and 87.1%, respectively, whereas specimens previously frozen at -70 degrees C gave a sensitivity of 96.2% and an accuracy of 95.4%. The sensitivity and accuracy of Abbott Testpack RSV were 92.6 and 91.3% for fresh specimens and 86.8 and 88.1% for frozen specimens. The advantages and drawbacks of the two assays are discussed.

摘要

VIDAS呼吸道合胞病毒检测法检测新鲜标本时的灵敏度和准确度分别为82.7%和87.1%,而之前在-70摄氏度冷冻的标本,其灵敏度为96.2%,准确度为95.4%。雅培呼吸道合胞病毒检测试剂盒检测新鲜标本时的灵敏度和准确度分别为92.6%和91.3%,检测冷冻标本时的灵敏度和准确度分别为86.8%和88.1%。文中讨论了这两种检测法的优缺点。

相似文献

6
Evaluation of five methods for respiratory syncytial virus detection.五种呼吸道合胞病毒检测方法的评估
J Clin Microbiol. 1990 May;28(5):1021-5. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.5.1021-1025.1990.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验