Freke A, Stott E J, Roome A P, Caul E O
J Med Virol. 1986 Feb;18(2):181-91. doi: 10.1002/jmv.1890180210.
Comparisons were made between standard methods of cell culture, indirect immunofluorescence (IF) using hyperimmune respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) antiserum, and indirect IF using mouse monoclonal antibodies directed against various epitopes of RSV for the detection of RSV in nasopharyngeal aspirates. The monoclonal antibodies were used singly and in pools of different specificities which in turn were tested in both direct and indirect IF. In a preliminary study, aspirates from 227 infants were examined for RSV by standard methods. The results were compared with the detection of RSV in these aspirates using nine separate monoclonal antibodies and a pool consisting of five monoclonal antibodies. Respiratory syncytial virus was detected in 64 (28%) by cell culture, in 68 (30%) by indirect IF using bovine polyclonal antibody (BPA), and in 75 (33%) by indirect IF using the monoclonal antibody pool. The nine individual monoclonal antibodies when tested separately were less sensitive, detecting between 8 and 77% of all aspirates found to be positive by culture. After statistical analysis of the results obtained in the preliminary study, a refined monoclonal antibody pool was prepared and in a further study was tested by both direct and indirect IF in parallel with our two standard methods. Slides prepared from 303 nasopharyngeal aspirates collected between 1981 and 1984 and either tested the same day or stored at -20 degrees C were used to evaluate these reagents. Overall agreement between the four tests was found in 274 (90%) specimens. Cell culture detected RSV in 68 (22%) specimens, indirect IF with BPA in 67 (22%), indirect IF with monoclonal antibody in 72 (24%), and direct IF with monoclonal antibody in 79 (26%). The pool of monoclonal antibodies used in direct or indirect IF was thus more sensitive than our standard methods for the detection of RSV in nasopharyngeal aspirates, and direct IF tests could be completed in 40 minutes.
对细胞培养的标准方法、使用高免疫呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)抗血清的间接免疫荧光法(IF)以及使用针对RSV各种表位的小鼠单克隆抗体的间接免疫荧光法进行了比较,以检测鼻咽抽吸物中的RSV。单克隆抗体单独使用以及按不同特异性组合使用,然后分别在直接免疫荧光法和间接免疫荧光法中进行检测。在一项初步研究中,采用标准方法对227名婴儿的抽吸物进行了RSV检测。将结果与使用9种单独的单克隆抗体和由5种单克隆抗体组成的组合对这些抽吸物中RSV的检测结果进行了比较。通过细胞培养在64份(28%)中检测到呼吸道合胞病毒,使用牛多克隆抗体(BPA)的间接免疫荧光法在68份(30%)中检测到,使用单克隆抗体组合的间接免疫荧光法在75份(33%)中检测到。9种单独的单克隆抗体分别检测时敏感性较低,检测到的所有培养阳性抽吸物的比例在8%至77%之间。对初步研究中获得的结果进行统计分析后,制备了一种改良的单克隆抗体组合,并在进一步的研究中与我们的两种标准方法同时通过直接免疫荧光法和间接免疫荧光法进行检测。使用1981年至1984年间收集的303份鼻咽抽吸物制备的玻片,当天检测或储存在-20℃下,用于评估这些试剂。在274份(90%)标本中发现四种检测方法总体一致。细胞培养在68份(22%)标本中检测到RSV,使用BPA的间接免疫荧光法在67份(22%)中检测到,使用单克隆抗体的间接免疫荧光法在72份(24%)中检测到,使用单克隆抗体的直接免疫荧光法在79份(26%)中检测到。因此,直接或间接免疫荧光法中使用的单克隆抗体组合比我们的标准方法在检测鼻咽抽吸物中的RSV时更敏感,并且直接免疫荧光检测可在40分钟内完成。