• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

特质的确认与反确认:归因偏差的发展

Trait confirmation and disconfirmation: the development of attribution biases.

作者信息

Aloise P A

机构信息

University of Florida.

出版信息

J Exp Child Psychol. 1993 Apr;55(2):177-93. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1993.1010.

DOI:10.1006/jecp.1993.1010
PMID:8501425
Abstract

In the present study, a new method for conducting person perception research, the confirmability paradigm, was adapted for use with children. In the confirmability paradigm subjects are asked how many behaviors they require before attributing positive and negative traits to other people. This new procedure was used to study developmental differences in the amount of information required for trait inference, as well as negativity and egocentric biases in trait attribution. Subjects were 70 children in grades 3 through 5 and 46 college students. The study revealed that traits differ in the amount of behavioral information required for their inference. In addition, a developmental decrease in attribution criteria was detected for various traits. Evidence for a negativity bias in the attribution of several traits was also obtained. Subjects exhibited an egocentric bias in their trait ratings but not in their attribution criteria. The utility of this new approach for the study of person perception is discussed.

摘要

在本研究中,一种用于进行人物感知研究的新方法——可确证性范式,被改编用于儿童。在可确证性范式中,会询问受试者在将积极和消极特质归因于他人之前需要多少行为依据。这个新程序被用于研究特质推断所需信息量的发展差异,以及特质归因中的消极性和自我中心偏差。受试者包括70名三至五年级的儿童和46名大学生。研究表明,不同特质在推断时所需的行为信息量不同。此外,还检测到各种特质的归因标准在发展过程中有所降低。还获得了几个特质归因中存在消极偏差的证据。受试者在特质评分中表现出自我中心偏差,但在归因标准中没有。本文讨论了这种新方法在人物感知研究中的效用。

相似文献

1
Trait confirmation and disconfirmation: the development of attribution biases.特质的确认与反确认:归因偏差的发展
J Exp Child Psychol. 1993 Apr;55(2):177-93. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1993.1010.
2
Components of young children's trait understanding: behavior-to-trait inferences and trait-to-behavior predictions.幼儿特质理解的组成部分:从行为到特质的推断以及从特质到行为的预测。
Child Dev. 2007 Sep-Oct;78(5):1543-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01082.x.
3
The confirmability and disconfirmability of trait concepts revisited: does content matter?特质概念的可证实性与可证伪性再探讨:内容重要吗?
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Mar;92(3):542-56. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.3.542.
4
Children's implicit personality theories as predictors of their social judgments.儿童的内隐人格理论作为其社会判断的预测因素。
Child Dev. 1993 Jun;64(3):863-78.
5
Egocentric pattern projection: how implicit personality theories recapitulate the geography of the self.自我中心模式投射:内隐人格理论如何重现自我的版图。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Jul;97(1):1-16. doi: 10.1037/a0015670.
6
The relation of role taking to the development of moral judgment in children.角色采择与儿童道德判断发展的关系。
Child Dev. 1971 Mar;42(1):79-91.
7
Social class differences in N400 indicate differences in spontaneous trait inference.社会阶层差异在 N400 中表现为自发特质推断的差异。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2012 Aug;141(3):518-26. doi: 10.1037/a0026104. Epub 2011 Nov 14.
8
Children's use of frequency information for trait categorization and behavioral prediction.儿童在特质分类和行为预测中对频率信息的运用。
Dev Psychol. 2006 May;42(3):500-13. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.42.3.500.
9
Do individuals with autism spectrum disorders infer traits from behavior?患有自闭症谱系障碍的个体是否会从行为中推断特质?
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2009 Jul;50(7):871-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2009.02053.x. Epub 2009 Feb 27.
10
The fundamental attribution error in detecting deception: the boy-who-cried-wolf effect.检测欺骗时的基本归因错误:“狼来了”效应。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2003 Oct;29(10):1316-27. doi: 10.1177/0146167203254610.

引用本文的文献

1
Children's Trait Inference and Partner Choice in a Cooperative Game.合作游戏中儿童的特质推断与伙伴选择
Child Dev. 2025 Jul-Aug;96(4):1458-1473. doi: 10.1111/cdev.14247. Epub 2025 Apr 12.
2
Heroes, villains, and everything in between: Children's assessment of morally ambiguous characters.英雄、反派及介于两者之间的一切:儿童对道德模糊角色的评估
J Exp Child Psychol. 2025 Aug;256:106251. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2025.106251. Epub 2025 Mar 28.
3
Three-month-olds show a negativity bias in their social evaluations.三个月大的婴儿在社会评价中表现出消极偏见。
Dev Sci. 2010 Nov;13(6):923-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.00951.x.
4
Valence Effects in Reasoning About Evaluative Traits.关于评价性特质推理中的效价效应。
Merrill Palmer Q (Wayne State Univ Press). 2004 Jan 1;50(1):86-109. doi: 10.1353/mpq.2004.0004.
5
Seeing The World Through Rose-colored Glasses? Neglect of Consensus Information in Young Children's Personality Judgments.戴着玫瑰色眼镜看世界?幼儿人格判断中对共识信息的忽视。
Soc Dev. 2008 May 1;17(2):399-416. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9507.2007.00431.x.
6
Not all emotions are created equal: the negativity bias in social-emotional development.并非所有情绪都是生来平等的:社会情感发展中的消极偏向。
Psychol Bull. 2008 May;134(3):383-403. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.3.383.