Medeiros J M, Smidt G L, Burmeister L F, Soderberg G L
Phys Ther. 1977 May;57(5):518-23. doi: 10.1093/ptj/57.5.518.
A method was designed to compare the effects of isometric contractions and passive stretch on modifying joint range of motion in 30 normal men. Subjects were randomly assigned into a control group, a passive stretch group, or an isometric contraction group. Each subject assumed a left sidelying position on the force table. Stabilization was applied to the pelvis and left lower extremity. The cuff, to which the force cable was attached, was applied to the right lower extremity. Force measurements produced by the isometric contractions or passive stretch procedures were stored on computer tape. The results of the mean differences in pelvifemoral angle measurements indicated that both treatment groups significantly increased their range of passive hip flexion with the knee extended when compared to the control group. Comparisons between the two treatment groups indicated that the isometric contraction and passive stretch procedures had significant and similar effects.
设计了一种方法来比较等长收缩和被动拉伸对30名正常男性关节活动范围的影响。受试者被随机分为对照组、被动拉伸组或等长收缩组。每个受试者在测力台上采取左侧卧位。对骨盆和左下肢进行固定。将连接有力缆的袖带应用于右下肢。等长收缩或被动拉伸程序产生的力测量值存储在计算机磁带上。骨盆股骨角度测量的平均差异结果表明,与对照组相比,两个治疗组在膝关节伸展时被动髋关节屈曲范围均显著增加。两个治疗组之间的比较表明,等长收缩和被动拉伸程序具有显著且相似的效果。