Suppr超能文献

咪达唑仑与地西泮的静脉并发症

Venous complications of midazolam versus diazepam.

作者信息

Carrougher J G, Kadakia S, Shaffer R T, Barrilleaux C

机构信息

Gastroenterology Service, Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 1993 May-Jun;39(3):396-9. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(93)70113-3.

Abstract

Although some studies have suggested fewer venous complications are associated with midazolam than with diazepam for endoscopic procedures, this variable has not been well documented. We prospectively evaluated the incidence of venous complications after intravenous injection of diazepam or midazolam in 122 consecutive patients undergoing colonoscopy and esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Overall, venous complications were more frequent with diazepam (22 of 62 patients) than with midazolam (4 of 60 patients) (p < 0.001). A palpable venous cord was present in 23% (14 of 62) of patients in the diazepam group, compared with 2% (1 of 60 patients) in the midazolam group (p < 0.002). Pain at the injection site occurred in 35% (22 of 62) of patients in the diazepam group compared with 7% (4 of 60 patients) in the midazolam group (p < 0.001). Swelling and warmth at the injection site were not significantly different between the two groups. Smoking, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use, intravenous catheter site, dwell time of the needle, alcohol use, and pain during the injection had no effect on the incidence of venous complications.

摘要

尽管一些研究表明,在内镜检查中,与地西泮相比,咪达唑仑引发的静脉并发症较少,但这一变量尚未得到充分记录。我们前瞻性评估了122例连续接受结肠镜检查和食管胃十二指肠镜检查的患者静脉注射地西泮或咪达唑仑后静脉并发症的发生率。总体而言,地西泮组(62例患者中有22例)的静脉并发症比咪达唑仑组(60例患者中有4例)更常见(p < 0.001)。地西泮组23%(62例中的14例)的患者出现可触及的静脉条索,而咪达唑仑组为2%(60例中的1例)(p < 0.002)。地西泮组35%(62例中的22例)的患者注射部位出现疼痛,而咪达唑仑组为7%(60例中的4例)(p < 0.001)。两组注射部位的肿胀和发热情况无显著差异。吸烟、使用非甾体抗炎药、静脉导管部位、针头留置时间、饮酒以及注射时的疼痛对静脉并发症的发生率均无影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验