Arrowsmith J B, Gerstman B B, Fleischer D E, Benjamin S B
U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, MD.
Gastrointest Endosc. 1991 Jul-Aug;37(4):421-7. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(91)70773-6.
We used data from the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy's computer-based management system to compare the rates of serious cardiorespiratory complications and death associated with the use of midazolam and diazepam. Data were analyzed from 21,011 procedures. Midazolam was used in 15,061 of these procedures, diazepam in 4,302, and neither in 1,648. We assessed benzodiazepine dose, concomitant drug administration, type of procedure, and selected patient characteristics in each of these three groups. No significant difference between these three groups were noted other than the fact that certain clinical centers tended to exclusively use midazolam, whereas others used both benzodiazepines. Reports of serious cardiorespiratory complications and death were uncommon, occurring in 5.4 and 0.3 per thousand procedures, respectively. Midazolam did not seem to place patients in this sample at greater risk for cardiorespiratory complications than diazepam. Concomitant use of narcotics and urgent and emergent procedures, however, did increase the risk of serious cardiorespiratory events.
我们使用了美国胃肠内镜学会基于计算机的管理系统中的数据,来比较使用咪达唑仑和地西泮相关的严重心肺并发症发生率及死亡率。对21011例手术的数据进行了分析。其中15061例手术使用了咪达唑仑,4302例使用了地西泮,1648例未使用任何一种药物。我们评估了这三组中每组的苯二氮䓬类药物剂量、伴随用药、手术类型及选定的患者特征。除了某些临床中心倾向于仅使用咪达唑仑,而其他中心同时使用两种苯二氮䓬类药物这一事实外,这三组之间未发现显著差异。严重心肺并发症和死亡报告并不常见,分别发生于每千例手术中的5.4例和0.3例。在该样本中,咪达唑仑似乎并未使患者发生心肺并发症的风险高于地西泮。然而,同时使用麻醉剂以及进行急诊和紧急手术确实会增加发生严重心肺事件的风险。