Suppr超能文献

Diazepam versus midazolam for colonoscopy: a prospective evaluation of predicted versus actual dosing requirements.

作者信息

Ginsberg G G, Lewis J H, Gallagher J E, Fleischer D E, al-Kawas F H, Nguyen C C, Mundt D J, Benjamin S B

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 1992 Nov-Dec;38(6):651-6. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(92)70559-8.

Abstract

We performed a prospective, randomized, double-blind study to evaluate the efficacy of the currently recommended low doses of midazolam for conscious sedation compared with diazepam for colonoscopy. Each agent was administered in a fixed ratio dose in combination with meperidine, and titrated incrementally to allow for adequate sedation prior to initiating and during the procedure. The currently recommended starting dose of midazolam (0.03 mg/kg) proved to be very appropriate for pre-medication. In contrast, the currently recommended starting dose of diazepam (0.10 mg/kg) proved excessive in 21% of patients (especially in those aged > 65). The low initial and incremental doses of midazolam compared favorably with diazepam in all efficacy parameters studied and exceeded diazepam in post-procedure amnesia scores (p = 0.01). Moreover, the sedative effects of midazolam at these lower doses were not lost despite long duration procedures (> 40 min). We conclude that midazolam, given in small incremental doses, in combination with meperidine, produces effective conscious sedation for colonoscopy and exceeds diazepam in its amnestic effect.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验