Lewis B S, Shlien R D, Wayne J D, Knight R J, Aldoroty R A
Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Medical Center, City University of New York, New York 10029.
Gastrointest Endosc. 1989 Jan-Feb;35(1):33-6. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(89)72682-1.
Midazolam is a new parenteral benzodiazepine premedication for endoscopy. Consecutive patients were randomized to receive either intravenous midazolam or diazepam as premedication for outpatient total colonoscopy by one endoscopist. Fifty-five patients received diazepam (0.15 mg/kg) and 50 received midazolam (0.07 mg/kg). Both patient and endoscopist were blind to the study drug used. The two groups were similar with respect to age, sex, and indication for colonoscopy. Patients were rated by the endoscopist for degree of cooperation, sedation, and pain during examination. There was significantly more oversedation in the midazolam group than in the diazepam group (p less than 0.05). Immediate procedure recall was less in midazolam patients (p less than 0.005), but on repeat interview the next day there was no difference between the two groups concerning recall of the endoscopy. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the incidence of arm pain. We conclude that in a clinical setting, midazolam does not appear to offer any significant advantage over diazepam, except for cost. Midazolam carries an increased risk of oversedation when it is administered on a milligram per kilogram basis and should instead be titrated individually.
咪达唑仑是一种用于内镜检查的新型胃肠外苯二氮䓬类术前用药。连续的患者由一名内镜医师随机分为接受静脉注射咪达唑仑或地西泮作为门诊全结肠镜检查的术前用药。55名患者接受地西泮(0.15mg/kg),50名接受咪达唑仑(0.07mg/kg)。患者和内镜医师均不知道所使用的研究药物。两组在年龄、性别和结肠镜检查指征方面相似。内镜医师对患者在检查期间的合作程度、镇静程度和疼痛程度进行评分。咪达唑仑组的过度镇静明显多于地西泮组(p<0.05)。咪达唑仑患者的即刻检查回忆较少(p<0.005),但在第二天的重复访谈中,两组在内镜检查回忆方面没有差异。两组在手臂疼痛发生率上没有显著差异。我们得出结论,在临床环境中,除了成本外,咪达唑仑似乎没有比地西泮有任何显著优势。按每公斤体重毫克数给药时,咪达唑仑导致过度镇静的风险增加,而应改为个体化滴定给药。