Chen J H, Wu S C, Shao W Q, Zou M H, Hu J, Cong L, Miao L, Wang C, Dong J, Gao J, Xiao B L
National Research Institute for Family Planning, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Contraception. 1998 Jun;57(6):371-9. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(98)00043-2.
The objective of this paper was to compare the efficacy, acceptability, safety, and bleeding pattern of TCu 380A intrauterine device (IUD) and progesterone-releasing vaginal ring used by breastfeeding women. The study population included 97 breastfeeding women using IUD and 100 women using vaginal ring. Of the IUD users, no insertion failure, perforation, or accidental pregnancy occurred in 12 months. There was one IUD expulsion. There were no discontinuations of IUD due to medical reasons other than expulsion. The total discontinuation rate was 2.3%. In the ring group, no accidental pregnancy occurred. The major reasons for discontinuation were ring use-related problems and vaginal problems. The total discontinuation rate was 65.4% within 1 year. The frequency of any one complaint among the ring users was higher than that among the IUD users. There were no differences in the proportion of women having no sexual activity and in the weight of their babies between the two groups. Compared with the IUD users, the median number of bleeding/spotting (B/S) episodes and B/S days of the vaginal ring users were fewer; consequently, the mean length of B/S-free interval was longer in all four reference periods; the mean length of B/S episode and segment were the same; the occurrence of amenorrhea was more frequent; in contrast, the proportions of normal bleeding patterns were fewer. The frequencies of prolonged bleeding, frequent bleeding, and infrequent bleeding patterns did not differ between the two groups. The percentage of irregular bleeding was fewer only in the first two reference periods. It is concluded that the TCu 380A IUD and progesterone-releasing vaginal ring used by breastfeeding women are safe and effective. The higher discontinuation rate of the ring users was mainly because of use-related problems. Breastfeeding women with TCu 380A IUD had better tolerance and acceptability. The TCu 380A IUD does not, but the progesterone-releasing vaginal ring does, suppress the recovery of ovarian function. However, once return of menstruation occurred, there were no differences in bleeding patterns between the two contraceptive methods.
本文的目的是比较哺乳期妇女使用的TCu 380A宫内节育器(IUD)和含孕酮阴道环的有效性、可接受性、安全性及出血模式。研究人群包括97名使用IUD的哺乳期妇女和100名使用阴道环的妇女。在IUD使用者中,12个月内未发生置入失败、穿孔或意外妊娠。有1例IUD脱落。除脱落外,无因其他医学原因停用IUD的情况。总停用率为2.3%。在阴道环组,未发生意外妊娠。停用的主要原因是与阴道环使用相关的问题和阴道问题。1年内总停用率为65.4%。阴道环使用者中任何一种不适的发生率高于IUD使用者。两组中无性生活的妇女比例及其婴儿体重无差异。与IUD使用者相比,阴道环使用者的出血/点滴出血(B/S)发作次数和B/S天数中位数较少;因此,在所有四个参考期内,无B/S间隔的平均长度较长;B/S发作和时间段的平均长度相同;闭经的发生率更高;相比之下,正常出血模式的比例较少。两组间长时间出血、频繁出血和不频繁出血模式的发生率无差异。仅在前两个参考期内,不规则出血的百分比更低。结论是,哺乳期妇女使用的TCu 380A IUD和含孕酮阴道环是安全有效的。阴道环使用者较高的停用率主要是由于与使用相关的问题。使用TCu 380A IUD的哺乳期妇女耐受性和可接受性更好。TCu 380A IUD不会,但含孕酮阴道环会抑制卵巢功能的恢复。然而,一旦月经恢复,两种避孕方法的出血模式无差异。