Suppr超能文献

铜T 380A宫内节育器与铜T 200宫内节育器的避孕效果:六个发展中国家的一项对比临床试验结果。

Contraceptive efficacy of the Copper T 380A and Copper T 200 intrauterine devices: results from a comparative clinical trial in six developing countries.

作者信息

Farr G, Amatya R

机构信息

Family Health International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709.

出版信息

Contraception. 1994 Mar;49(3):231-43. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(94)90041-8.

Abstract

The clinical performance of the Copper T 380A (TCu 380A) and the Copper T 200 (TCu 200) intrauterine devices (IUDs) was evaluated for 12 months in a group of women who had one of the two IUDs inserted. Results are from a multicenter randomized clinical trial at one site in each of six developing countries. The pregnancy rate with the TCu 380A IUD was significantly lower than the pregnancy rate with the TCu 200 IUD at 12 months (0.5 and 2.6 per 100 women, respectively, p < 0.01). No statistically significant differences between the two study IUDs were found with regards to expulsion or removals due to bleeding/pain, personal, medical, or planned pregnancy. The TCu 380A IUD did not have a disproportionately higher incidence of side effects such as intermenstrual bleeding or pain, inflammations or infections, or insertion-related events compared to the TCu 200 IUD. TCu 380A IUD users, however, were significantly more likely to report increased dysmenorrhea than were TCu 200 IUD users. The performance of the TCu 380A IUD in preventing pregnancy during this trial indicates that this IUD may be a better option than the TCu 200 IUD for women wishing to practice effective, long-term, reversible birth control without having to resort to hormonal methods.

摘要

对一组植入了铜T 380A(TCu 380A)或铜T 200(TCu 200)宫内节育器(IUD)的女性进行了为期12个月的临床性能评估。研究结果来自六个发展中国家各一个地点的多中心随机临床试验。在12个月时,TCu 380A宫内节育器的妊娠率显著低于TCu 200宫内节育器(分别为每100名女性0.5例和2.6例,p < 0.01)。在因出血/疼痛、个人原因、医疗原因或计划妊娠导致的节育器排出或取出方面,两种研究用宫内节育器之间未发现统计学上的显著差异。与TCu 200宫内节育器相比,TCu 380A宫内节育器在诸如经间期出血或疼痛、炎症或感染、或与放置相关的事件等副作用方面的发生率并未过高。然而,与TCu 200宫内节育器使用者相比,TCu 380A宫内节育器使用者更有可能报告痛经加剧。在本次试验中,TCu 380A宫内节育器在预防妊娠方面的表现表明,对于希望采用有效、长期、可逆的避孕方法而又不必采用激素方法的女性来说,这种宫内节育器可能是比TCu 200宫内节育器更好的选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验