• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

TCu 380A和TCu 220C宫内节育器在四个发展中国家计划生育诊所的临床性能。

Clinical performance of the TCu 380A and TCu 220C IUDs in four developing country family planning clinics.

作者信息

Farr G, Amatya R, Betancourt J D, David M, Alfonso L, Dacalos E

机构信息

Family Health International, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.

出版信息

Contraception. 1994 Nov;50(5):417-29. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(94)90059-0.

DOI:10.1016/0010-7824(94)90059-0
PMID:7859451
Abstract

The clinical performance of the Copper T 380A (TCu 380A) and the Copper T 220C (TCu 220C) intrauterine devices (IUDs) were evaluated for 12 months in a group of women who had one of the two IUDs inserted. Results are from a randomized clinical trial conducted at four collaborating research sites located in two developing countries. The gross cumulative life-table pregnancy rate of the TCu 380A IUD was found to be lower than that of the TCu 220C IUD at 12 months (0.3 and 0.8, respectively), although this difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Statistically significant differences between the two study IUDs were not found with regard to IUD expulsion or IUD removal due to bleeding/pain, personal reasons, medical reasons, or planned pregnancy. No statistically significant differences were observed in the frequency of experiencing menstrual disturbances (i.e., dysmenorrhea, intermenstrual pelvic pain or intermenstrual bleeding) between the two IUD groups. These data suggest that the TCu 380A and TCu 220C IUDs are both appropriate options for contracepting women. The TCu 380A IUD, however, may be a more appropriate option for those women wishing to space births over a longer period of time.

摘要

在一组插入了铜T 380A(TCu 380A)或铜T 220C(TCu 220C)宫内节育器(IUD)的女性中,对这两种IUD的临床性能进行了为期12个月的评估。结果来自于在两个发展中国家的四个合作研究地点进行的一项随机临床试验。在12个月时,发现TCu 380A IUD的总累积生命表妊娠率低于TCu 220C IUD(分别为0.3和0.8),尽管这种差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。在IUD脱落或因出血/疼痛、个人原因、医学原因或计划妊娠而取出IUD方面,未发现两种研究IUD之间存在统计学显著差异。两组IUD在经历月经紊乱(即痛经、经间期盆腔疼痛或经间期出血)的频率上未观察到统计学显著差异。这些数据表明TCu 380A和TCu 220C IUD都是适合避孕女性的选择。然而,对于那些希望更长时间间隔生育的女性来说,TCu 380A IUD可能是更合适的选择。

相似文献

1
Clinical performance of the TCu 380A and TCu 220C IUDs in four developing country family planning clinics.TCu 380A和TCu 220C宫内节育器在四个发展中国家计划生育诊所的临床性能。
Contraception. 1994 Nov;50(5):417-29. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(94)90059-0.
2
Clinical performance of the TCu 380A and Lippes Loop IUDs in three developing countries.TCu 380A宫内节育器和Lippes Loop宫内节育器在三个发展中国家的临床性能
Contraception. 1995 Jul;52(1):17-22. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(95)00119-u.
3
Contraceptive efficacy of the Copper T 380A and Copper T 200 intrauterine devices: results from a comparative clinical trial in six developing countries.铜T 380A宫内节育器与铜T 200宫内节育器的避孕效果:六个发展中国家的一项对比临床试验结果。
Contraception. 1994 Mar;49(3):231-43. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(94)90041-8.
4
Comparison of three different models of the copper T intrauterine contraceptive device.三种不同型号铜质宫内节育器的比较。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1979 Jul 1;134(5):568-74. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(79)90843-3.
5
Twelve-month comparative multicenter study of the TCu 380A and ML 250 intrauterine devices in Bangkok, Thailand.泰国曼谷TCu 380A宫内节育器与ML 250宫内节育器的12个月对比多中心研究。
Contraception. 1998 Oct;58(4):201-6. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(98)00097-3.
6
A comparative study of the TCu 380A versus TCu 200 IUDs in Nepal.尼泊尔TCu 380A与TCu 200宫内节育器的对比研究。
Asia Pac Popul J. 1995 Jun;10(2):15-26.
7
Performances of copper T 380A and multiload copper 375/250 intrauterine contraceptive devices in a comparative clinical trial.铜T 380A宫内节育器与多负载铜375/250宫内节育器在一项对比临床试验中的性能表现。
Afr J Med Med Sci. 1995 Mar;24(1):59-65.
8
The comparative trial of TCu 380A IUD and progesterone-releasing vaginal ring used by lactating women.哺乳期妇女使用TCu 380A宫内节育器与含孕酮阴道环的对比试验。
Contraception. 1998 Jun;57(6):371-9. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(98)00043-2.
9
An evaluation of the levonorgestrel-releasing IUD: its advantages and disadvantages when compared to the copper-releasing IUDs.左炔诺孕酮宫内节育器评估:与含铜宫内节育器相比的优缺点。
Contraception. 1991 Dec;44(6):573-88. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(91)90078-t.
10
[A comparative study of three types of IUD].
Shengzhi Yu Biyun. 1991 Nov;11(4):46-54.