Ratcliff R, Van Zandt T, McKoon G
Psychology Department, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, USA.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1995 Dec;124(4):352-74. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.124.4.352.
According to the assumptions of L. L. Jacoby's (1991) process dissociation method, performance in recognition memory is determined by the combination of an unconscious familiarity process and a conscious intentional recollection process. The process dissociation method is used to produce estimates of the contributions of the 2 components to recognition performance. This article investigates whether the method provides the correct estimates of components if performance actually depends on only a single process or on 2 processes different from those assumed by the method. The SAM model (G. Gillund & R. M. Shiffrin, 1984) was used to produce simulated data based on a single process. Variants of SAM with 2 processes and R. C. Atkinson and J. F. Juola's (1973) 2-process model were used to produce data based on 2 processes.
根据L. L. 雅可比(1991年)的过程分离法的假设,识别记忆中的表现是由无意识的熟悉过程和有意识的有意回忆过程共同决定的。过程分离法用于估计这两个成分对识别表现的贡献。本文研究了如果表现实际上仅取决于一个过程或取决于与该方法所假设的两个过程不同的两个过程时,该方法是否能提供对成分的正确估计。使用SAM模型(G. 吉隆德和R. M. 希夫林,1984年)基于一个过程生成模拟数据。具有两个过程的SAM变体以及R. C. 阿特金森和J. F. 乔拉(1973年)的双过程模型用于基于两个过程生成数据。