Buchner Axel, Erdfelder Edgar, Vaterrodt-Plünnecke Bianca
U Trier, Dept of Psychology.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1995 Jun;124(2):137-160. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.124.2.137.
L.L. Jacoby's (1991) process dissociation framework has been welcomed as a tool for differentiating controlled and automatic cognitive processes. Several variants of the original process dissociation measurement model are integrated in this article, and it is shown that the model ignores guessing and, hence, response bias. An extension of the original model is suggested that includes guessing parameters. The original model and the extended model are evaluated empirically. In 3 experiments using a yes-no recognition task, response bias was manipulated in various ways. The original model falsely attributes effects of response biases to either controlled or uncontrolled processes or to both. The extended model, in contrast, results in estimates of the contributions of controlled and uncontrolled memory processes that are relatively unaffected by response biases. The extended model is recommended as a measurement tool.
L.L. 雅各比（1991年）的过程分离框架作为区分受控和自动认知过程的工具受到了欢迎。本文整合了原始过程分离测量模型的几种变体，并表明该模型忽略了猜测，因此也忽略了反应偏差。建议对原始模型进行扩展，纳入猜测参数。对原始模型和扩展模型进行了实证评估。在3个使用是非判断识别任务的实验中，以各种方式操纵反应偏差。原始模型错误地将反应偏差的影响归因于受控或不受控过程，或两者兼而有之。相比之下，扩展模型得出的受控和不受控记忆过程贡献的估计相对不受反应偏差的影响。推荐使用扩展模型作为一种测量工具。
