Jaakkola J J, Miettinen P
Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Finland.
Occup Environ Med. 1995 Nov;52(11):709-14. doi: 10.1136/oem.52.11.709.
To examine the relation between ventilation rate and occurrence of symptoms of the eyes, nose, throat, and skin as well as general symptoms such as lethargy and headache, often termed the sick building syndrome.
A cross sectional population based study was carried out in 399 workers from 14 mechanically ventilated office buildings without air recirculation or humidification, selected randomly from the Helsinki metropolitan area. The ventilation type and other characteristics of these buildings were recorded on a site visit and the ventilation in the rooms was assessed by measuring the airflow through the exhaust air outlets in the room. A questionnaire directed at workers inquired about the symptoms and perceived air quality and their possible personal and environmental determinants (response rate 81%). The outcomes were weekly work related symptoms experienced during the previous 12 months and symptom groups defined either by their anatomical location or hypothesised mechanism.
In logistic regression analysis, the adjusted odds ratio (OR) for any symptom of interest was 3.03 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.13 to 8.10) in the very low ventilation category of below 5 l/s per person and 2.24 (0.89 to 5.65) in the high ventilation category of over 25 l/s per person compared with the reference (15- < 25 l/s). The ORs for ocular (1.27, 1.11 to 1.46), nasal (1.17, 1.06 to 1.29), skin symptoms (1.18, 1.05 to 1.32), and lethargy (1.09, 1.00 to 1.19) increased significantly by a unit decrease in ventilation from 25 to 0 l/s per person.
The results suggest that outdoor air ventilation rates below the optimal (15 to 25 l/s per person) increase the risk of the symptoms of sick building syndrome with the sources of pollutants present in mechanically ventilated office buildings. The Finnish guideline value is 10 l/s per person.
研究通风率与眼睛、鼻子、喉咙和皮肤症状以及诸如嗜睡和头痛等一般症状(通常称为病态建筑综合征)的发生之间的关系。
对从赫尔辛基大都市区随机选取的14座无空气再循环或加湿的机械通风办公楼中的399名工人进行了一项基于人群的横断面研究。在实地考察时记录了这些建筑的通风类型和其他特征,并通过测量房间排气口的气流来评估房间内的通风情况。向工人发放的一份问卷询问了症状、感知到的空气质量及其可能的个人和环境决定因素(回复率81%)。结果是过去12个月中每周与工作相关的症状以及根据解剖位置或假设机制定义的症状组。
在逻辑回归分析中,与参考值(15 - < 25升/秒)相比,每人低于5升/秒的极低通风类别中,任何感兴趣症状的调整优势比(OR)为3.03(95%置信区间(95%CI)1.13至8.10),每人超过25升/秒的高通风类别中为2.24(0.89至5.65)。随着每人通风量从25降至0升/秒,眼部症状(1.27,1.11至1.46)、鼻部症状(1.17,1.06至1.29)、皮肤症状(1.18,1.05至1.32)和嗜睡(1.09,1.00至1.19)的OR值显著增加。
结果表明,在机械通风的办公楼中,室外空气通风率低于最佳值(每人15至25升/秒)会增加病态建筑综合征症状的风险,且存在污染物来源。芬兰的指导值是每人10升/秒。