Mendell M J, Smith A H
Department of Biomedical and Environmental Health Sciences, University of California, Berkeley.
Am J Public Health. 1990 Oct;80(10):1193-9. doi: 10.2105/ajph.80.10.1193.
Published studies of the relation between type of building ventilation system and work-related symptom prevalence in office workers have been contradictory. A reanalysis was performed of six studies meeting specific eligibility criteria, combining published data with unpublished information obtained from study authors. Five eligible studies were from the United Kingdom, and one was from Denmark. Standardized categories of building ventilation type were created to allow comparison of effects across studies. Within each study, prevalence odds ratios (PORs) were calculated for symptoms in each ventilation category relative to a baseline category of naturally ventilated buildings. Air-conditioned buildings were consistently associated with increased prevalence of work-related headache (POR = 1.3-3.1), lethargy (POR = 1.4-5.1), and upper respiratory/mucus membrane symptoms (POR = 1.3-4.8). Humidification was not a necessary factor for the higher symptom prevalence associated with air-conditioning. Mechanical ventilation without air-conditioning was not associated with higher symptom prevalence. The consistent associations found between type of building ventilation and reported symptom prevalence have potentially important public health and economic implications.
已发表的关于办公建筑通风系统类型与上班族工作相关症状患病率之间关系的研究结果相互矛盾。对六项符合特定入选标准的研究进行了重新分析,将已发表的数据与从研究作者处获得的未发表信息相结合。五项符合条件的研究来自英国,一项来自丹麦。创建了建筑通风类型的标准化类别,以便比较各项研究的结果。在每项研究中,计算了每个通风类别中症状相对于自然通风建筑基线类别的患病率比值比(POR)。空调建筑始终与工作相关头痛患病率增加(POR = 1.3 - 3.1)、无精打采(POR = 1.4 - 5.1)以及上呼吸道/粘膜症状患病率增加(POR = 1.3 - 4.8)相关。加湿并非与空调相关的较高症状患病率的必要因素。无空调的机械通风与较高的症状患病率无关。建筑通风类型与报告的症状患病率之间一致的关联具有潜在的重要公共卫生和经济意义。