Ikeda I, Sasaki E, Yasunami H, Nomiyama S, Nakayama M, Sugano M, Imaizumi K, Yazawa K
Laboratory of Nutrition Chemistry, Kyushu University School of Agriculture 46-09, Fukuoka, Japan.
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1995 Dec 7;1259(3):297-304. doi: 10.1016/0005-2760(95)00180-8.
Lymphatic transport of eicosapentaenoic (EPA) and docosahexaenoic (DHA) acids given as trieicosapentaenoyl glycerol (TriEPA) and tridocosahexaenoyl glycerol (TriDHA) was compared with that of ethyl ester and free acid in rats cannulated with thoracic duct. Trioleoylglycerol (TO) served as a control. EPA and DHA, compared with oleic acid, were slowly transported in lymph irrespective of fat types administered. Total 24-h recovery of DHA in all fat types and ethyl EPA was significantly lower compared to that of oleic acid. Lymphatic recovery of EPA and DHA in rats given TriEPA and TriDHA was significantly higher at the first 3 h after the administration compared to those given as free acid or ethyl ester. The recovery in rats given free acid at a later stage (9-24 h) was higher than that of the other fat types. As a result, the 24-h recovery was comparable between triacylglycerol (TAG) and free acid, while it was significantly lower in ethyl ester. Although TriEPA and TriDHA were slowly hydrolyzed by pancreatic lipase in vitro compared with TO and TAGs rich in EPA or DHA at the second position, the hydrolysis rate at 60 min incubation was comparable among the TAGs examined. The hydrolysis rate of ethyl esters was extremely low even in 6 h incubation with lipase. These observations show that presence of EPA and DHA at the 1- and 3-positions of TAGs does not result in their lower recovery in lymph. Processes after lipolysis may be responsible for their low recovery in lymph. In a separate study, slower lymphatic recovery of DHA given as free acid than TriDHA was improved by the simultaneous administration of TO, but not by free oleic acid. The observations suggest that the slow recovery of free acid is caused by delayed TAG synthesis in mucosal cells and/or low micellar solubility of fatty acids in the intestinal lumen due to a limited supply of 2-monoacylglycerol (MAG). A large portion of EPA and DHA were recovered in lymph chylomicrons and very low density lipoproteins (VLDL, > 95%) and incorporated into TAG (84-92%) fraction in all fat types examined. Lymphatic recovery rate of simultaneously administered cholesterol was influenced by the fat types given.
将作为甘油三亚麻酸酯(TriEPA)和甘油三二十二碳六烯酸酯(TriDHA)给予的二十碳五烯酸(EPA)和二十二碳六烯酸(DHA)的淋巴转运与乙酯和游离酸在胸导管插管大鼠中的淋巴转运进行了比较。甘油三油酸酯(TO)用作对照。与油酸相比,无论给予何种脂肪类型,EPA和DHA在淋巴中的转运都较慢。与油酸相比,所有脂肪类型和乙酯型EPA中DHA的24小时总回收率均显著较低。给予TriEPA和TriDHA的大鼠中,EPA和DHA的淋巴回收率在给药后的前3小时显著高于给予游离酸或乙酯的大鼠。后期(9 - 24小时)给予游离酸的大鼠的回收率高于其他脂肪类型。结果,三酰甘油(TAG)和游离酸的24小时回收率相当,而乙酯型的回收率则显著较低。尽管与TO以及在第二位富含EPA或DHA的TAGs相比,TriEPA和TriDHA在体外被胰脂肪酶缓慢水解,但在所检测的TAGs中,60分钟孵育时的水解速率相当。即使与脂肪酶孵育6小时,乙酯的水解速率也极低。这些观察结果表明,TAGs的1位和3位存在EPA和DHA并不会导致它们在淋巴中的回收率降低。脂解后的过程可能是它们在淋巴中回收率低的原因。在另一项研究中,同时给予TO可改善游离酸形式的DHA比TriDHA的淋巴回收率慢的情况,但游离油酸则无此作用。这些观察结果表明,游离酸回收率低是由于粘膜细胞中TAG合成延迟和/或由于2 - 单酰甘油(MAG)供应有限导致脂肪酸在肠腔中的胶束溶解度低所致。在所检测的所有脂肪类型中,大部分EPA和DHA在淋巴乳糜微粒和极低密度脂蛋白(VLDL,> 95%)中被回收,并掺入TAG(84 - 92%)部分。同时给予的胆固醇的淋巴回收率受所给脂肪类型的影响。