Wolfe V, Cornell R, Fitch J
Auburn University at Montgomery, Alabama 36117, USA.
J Voice. 1995 Sep;9(3):297-303. doi: 10.1016/s0892-1997(05)80237-1.
Considering the widespread use of the sustained vowel in the evaluation of voice disorders, our objective was to study the degree to which the vowel is representative of voice in continuous speech. Phonatory samples were recorded from 20 normal subjects and 60 patients representing commonly occurring voice problems (nodules, unilateral paralysis, and functional). The phonatory samples were evaluated by 25 listeners on the basis of 12 bipolar, semantic differential scales. Factor analysis produced two perceptual dimensions with similar loadings for both vowels and sentences. A correlation of 0.78 was obtained between vowels and sentences on factor 1 scores, "vocal severity," and a correlation of 0.77 was obtained between vowels and sentences on factor 2 scores, "pitch/quality." Six of the 80 pairs of sentences and vowels differed by two scale points or more on vocal severity. Results suggest that although a relatively strong relationship exists between the two measures, sustained vowel sounds may not be an adequate clinical index to the dysphonic severity of continuous speech.
鉴于持续元音在嗓音障碍评估中的广泛应用,我们的目标是研究该元音在连续语音中代表嗓音的程度。对20名正常受试者和60名代表常见嗓音问题(结节、单侧麻痹和功能性问题)的患者进行发声样本记录。25名听众根据12个双极语义差异量表对发声样本进行评估。因子分析产生了两个感知维度,元音和句子在这两个维度上的载荷相似。在因子1得分“嗓音严重程度”上,元音和句子之间的相关性为0.78,在因子2得分“音高/音质”上,元音和句子之间的相关性为0.77。80对句子和元音中有6对在嗓音严重程度上相差两个或更多量表分值。结果表明,尽管这两种测量方法之间存在相对较强的关系,但持续元音声音可能不是连续语音发声困难严重程度的充分临床指标。